Re: Bug#810018: New Essential package procps-base

2023-11-20 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Nov 20, Craig Small wrote: > Also why is killall5 not a candidate too? Probably because it makes no sense outside of sysvinit, except that as a footgun. (Also, is it equivalent to pkill --inverse?) -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#810018: New Essential package procps-base

2023-11-19 Thread Craig Small
On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 23:03, Guillem Jover wrote: > I'm all in for shrinking the essential-set. If there is consensus to > switch pidof implementations that also seems fine to me in the abstract. > But this shuffling around of essential-ness and new tiny packages and > stuff seems a bit