Some time around Wed, 17 Jun 1998 11:21:08 +1000,
Herbert Xu wrote:
Scott Ellis wrote:
No, you're not hiding this on the bug tracking system any more.
Neither are you.
The reason that sendmail broke is that you made a DELIBERATE modification
to procmail that sendmail
Scott Ellis wrote:
No, you're not hiding this on the bug tracking system any more.
Neither are you.
The reason that sendmail broke is that you made a DELIBERATE modification
to procmail that sendmail wasn't expecting. While I agree that sendmail
That's just simply true. If you have a short
Brian White wrote:
severity 23000 normal
--
The reason that sendmail broke is that you made a DELIBERATE modification
to procmail that sendmail wasn't expecting. While I agree that sendmail
should probably be more graceful about handling it, it is not a
release-critical error. A vast
No, you're not hiding this on the bug tracking system any more.
The reason that sendmail broke is that you made a DELIBERATE modification
to procmail that sendmail wasn't expecting. While I agree that sendmail
should probably be more graceful about handling it, it is not a
release-critical
Scott Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, you're not hiding this on the bug tracking system any more.
Come on, cool down! That´s a bad way to get this resolved. Please
DON´T do that again. I think -private would have been more apropriate.
I know everybody is getting nervous in this deep
severity 23000 normal
--
The reason that sendmail broke is that you made a DELIBERATE modification
to procmail that sendmail wasn't expecting. While I agree that sendmail
should probably be more graceful about handling it, it is not a
release-critical error. A vast majority of people (like
6 matches
Mail list logo