hi,
2013/5/23 Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org:
Am Donnerstag, den 23.05.2013, 08:51 +0200 schrieb Bjoern Meier:
hi,
2013/5/23 Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org:
Joss isn't the only one to blame. Could all please stop bashing each
other (and Joss) and stick back to technical arguments? (Saying
:01 +0200
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
Subject: Bwah I will tell my daddy^W^Wthe CTTE^W^Wa GR
Couldn't you please finally stop behaving like a five years old?
--
WBR, Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
hi,
2013/5/23 Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org:
Joss isn't the only one to blame. Could all please stop bashing each other
(and Joss) and stick back to technical arguments? (Saying I'm sorry
privately to each other for each ad hominem argument used in this thread
would also help!)
I can
Am Donnerstag, den 23.05.2013, 08:51 +0200 schrieb Bjoern Meier:
hi,
2013/5/23 Ondřej Surý ond...@sury.org:
Joss isn't the only one to blame. Could all please stop bashing each
other (and Joss) and stick back to technical arguments? (Saying I'm
sorry privately to each other for each ad
Le mercredi 22 mai 2013 à 21:27 +0200, Martin Wuertele a écrit :
Seems like you haven't realised yet: only if a maintainer makes
controversal decisions and several others disagree such a case comes
before the CTTE.
Having choices ending up twice within relatively short time before the
Hello,
On Wed, 22 May 2013 23:05:01 +0200
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote:
Subject: Bwah I will tell my daddy^W^Wthe CTTE^W^Wa GR
Couldn't you please finally stop behaving like a five years old?
--
WBR, Andrew
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
6 matches
Mail list logo