Julian Gilbey wrote:
Is it my imagination, or is bugreport.cgi *really* slow? I think that
we should really investigate the possibility of using mod_perl. It's
using CGI.pm, which is *big* and takes time to load. I've written
scripts which I use under mod_perl and the time difference is
On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 04:56:29PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
Julian Gilbey wrote:
Is it my imagination, or is bugreport.cgi *really* slow? I think that
we should really investigate the possibility of using mod_perl. It's
using CGI.pm, which is *big* and takes time to load. I've written
Anthony,
Is it my imagination, or is bugreport.cgi *really* slow? I think that
we should really investigate the possibility of using mod_perl. It's
using CGI.pm, which is *big* and takes time to load. I've written
scripts which I use under mod_perl and the time difference is
astonishing. It
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 01:53:46PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Anthony,
Is it my imagination, or is bugreport.cgi *really* slow? I think that
we should really investigate the possibility of using mod_perl. It's
using CGI.pm, which is *big* and takes time to load. I've written
scripts
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 03:43:29PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 01:53:46PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Anthony,
Is it my imagination, or is bugreport.cgi *really* slow? I think that
we should really investigate the possibility of using mod_perl. It's
using
5 matches
Mail list logo