Re: Comma in Maintainer field (Was: problems in gjots2 and Debian)

2018-04-19 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 06:58:00AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > udd=# select distinct maintainer from packages where maintainer like '%,%' > > order by maintainer; > > maintainer > > > >

Re: Comma in Maintainer field (Was: problems in gjots2 and Debian)

2018-04-19 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 08:37:07AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:52:18PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 04:00:51PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > Instead, tools grew to tolerate commas here rather than treat them as > > > separators

Re: Comma in Maintainer field (Was: problems in gjots2 and Debian)

2018-04-19 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Thank you Andreas, this is surprisingly interesting. On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 08:37:07AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > "Adam C. Powell, IV" > Adam C. Powell, IV > Debian GNOME Maintainers , > Sebastian

Re: Comma in Maintainer field (Was: problems in gjots2 and Debian)

2018-04-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi again, for sure I also here forgot the restriction to release='sid'... On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 09:49:34AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 19.04.2018 um 08:37 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:52:18PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 04:00:51PM

Re: Comma in Maintainer field (Was: problems in gjots2 and Debian)

2018-04-19 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 19.04.2018 um 08:37 schrieb Andreas Tille: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:52:18PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 04:00:51PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: >>> Instead, tools grew to tolerate commas here rather than treat them as >>> separators (because they would mishandle

Comma in Maintainer field (Was: problems in gjots2 and Debian)

2018-04-19 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:52:18PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 04:00:51PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Instead, tools grew to tolerate commas here rather than treat them as > > separators (because they would mishandle the erroneous packages). > Is this the main