Am I overlooking something obvious here?
libgtk1.1.13-dev provides libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev
but
libgtk1.1-dev conflicts with libgtk-dev
this means that gnome-apt refuses to install libgtk1.1.13-dev,
a package that I sorely need. Aren't these relationships somewhat odd.
--
Eschew
On 30 Jan 1999, Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
Am I overlooking something obvious here?
libgtk1.1.13-dev provides libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev
but
libgtk1.1-dev conflicts with libgtk-dev
this means that gnome-apt refuses to install libgtk1.1.13-dev,
a package that I sorely need. Aren't
*-Jules Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| On 30 Jan 1999, Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
|
| Am I overlooking something obvious here?
|
| libgtk1.1.13-dev provides libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev
|
| but
|
| libgtk1.1-dev conflicts with libgtk-dev
|
| this means that gnome-apt refuses to install
On 30 Jan 1999, Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
*-Jules Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| On 30 Jan 1999, Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
|
| Am I overlooking something obvious here?
|
| libgtk1.1.13-dev provides libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev
|
| but
|
| libgtk1.1-dev conflicts with libgtk-dev
*-Jules Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| The fact that the *actual* libgtk1.1-dev package conflicts with
| libgtk-dev, does not mean that the package libgtk1.13-dev, which provides
| libgtk1.1-dev, must conflict with libgtk-dev.
|
| Or, in the abstract:
|
| If A conflicts with B, and C provides
On 30 Jan 1999, Ole J. Tetlie wrote:
*-Jules Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| The fact that the *actual* libgtk1.1-dev package conflicts with
| libgtk-dev, does not mean that the package libgtk1.13-dev, which provides
| libgtk1.1-dev, must conflict with libgtk-dev.
|
| Or, in the abstract
Ole == Ole J Tetlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ole Am I overlooking something obvious here? libgtk1.1.13-dev
Ole provides libgtk-dev and libgtk1.1-dev
Ole but
Ole libgtk1.1-dev conflicts with libgtk-dev
libgtk1.1-dev is really an obsolete package in potato. Think
7 matches
Mail list logo