On Apr 26, Mike Markley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it more confusing to have the package name differ by one letter from
the only binary in it, or is it more confusing for the package to be
named via a different convention than similar applications? Any input is
appreciated.
Probably it does
It has been suggested to me that I get some input from the list on the
naming of my recently uploaded packages for dkim-milter and dk-milter.
I thought I had opened an ITP for this purpose, but it turns out I had
not; hence this message.
The core issue: Upstream calls the *packages* dkim-milter
2 matches
Mail list logo
