On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 10:49 +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
If I need to subscribe to a bug I can't use the web interface.
The answer you might give is, Oh! Send am email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This may be a simple way to add that behaviour.
[snip]
I filed bug #353260 with a patch to do exactly
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 01:02:44AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Hi,
Not trying to start a flame war but can somebody give a convincing
explanation as to why don't we have a standard BTS ?
Because most standard BTSes suck?
If I need to subscribe to a bug I can't use the web interface.
Hi,
Not trying to start a flame war but can somebody give a convincing explanation
as to why don't we have a standard BTS ?
If I need to subscribe to a bug I can't use the web interface.
The answer you might give is, Oh! Send am email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't we have an interface to allow
la, 2006-07-08 kello 01:02 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf kirjoitti:
If I need to subscribe to a bug I can't use the web interface.
The answer you might give is, Oh! Send am email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't we have an interface to allow subscribing to a bug through the web
interface just like
Ritesh Raj Sarraf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Not trying to start a flame war but can somebody give a convincing explanation
as to why don't we have a standard BTS ?
I guess most standard BTSses can't be easily manipulated by E-Mail,
while ours can.
If I need to subscribe to a bug I can't
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 01:02:44AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Not trying to start a flame war but can somebody give a convincing explanation
as to why don't we have a standard BTS ?
There is a whole host of reasons. Some I can think of offhand:
- All other known alternatives have a
On Jul 07, Ritesh Raj Sarraf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not trying to start a flame war but can somebody give a convincing explanation
as to why don't we have a standard BTS ?
Because no such a thing exists, for a start. HTH.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: debbugs
Version: 2.4.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 01:02:44AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
If I need to subscribe to a bug I can't use the web interface.
The answer you might give is, Oh! Send am email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This may be a simple way to add
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 10:48:55AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
This may be a simple way to add that behaviour.
+print pa href=\mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subscribe/a to this bug./p
What about something like ``To subscribe to this bug, send an empty
email to a href=$email$email/a.'' to make more
On Fri, 07 Jul 2006, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 10:48:55AM +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
This may be a simple way to add that behaviour.
+print pa href=\mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subscribe/a to this
bug./p
What about something like ``To subscribe to this bug, send
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:19:12PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Fri, 07 Jul 2006, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
What about something like ``To subscribe to this bug, send an empty
email to a href=$email$email/a.'' to make more explicit that they
don't need to fill anything out?
There are a
11 matches
Mail list logo
