Paul Seelig wrote:
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 11:29:37AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Fri 08 Sep 2000, Paul Seelig wrote:
RMS should IMHO publically apologize with the KDE people for this
condescending part of his otherwise correct article. He should be
So now _you_ are telling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Stallman) writes:
Meanwhile, you don't seem to be concerned about the mob of people
who are attacking me.
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 06:06:53PM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
I may now be even more concerned that you seem to consider the authors
of free KDE software a
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 11:20:01PM -0600, Richard Stallman wrote:
I think you ought to apologize, for supporting this mob. I have
no reason to apologize for being its victim.
I, on behalf of everyone involved in the GPL KDE fiasco, humbly apologize to
everyone else for the actions, comitted by
You are picking at little details of my words, reading into them a
hostility which is not there. Meanwhile, you don't seem to be
concerned about the mob of people who are attacking me.
To me that says injustice and double standard. Injustice, because
you blame me for meanings that others
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 01:19:06PM -0300, Ben Woodhead wrote:
First I would like to give my appologies, I was not aware of the incomming
directory and I have been told that kde will be included. I would also like
to say that I personally do not use kde nor am a developer for them, my
consern
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 05:52:04PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
Fortunately, my part of it is done - KDE is being uploaded to Debian
now to join Qt in main. Unfortunately, not by any action of KDE. Troll
Tech made the decision. KDE and Debian both benefit. I can speak
for a sizable portion of
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 05:52:04PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
Richard's comment was apparently on the order of It's about time, which
apparently managed to peeve the KDE people who felt they needed to flame
him publicly over it.. *sigh*
It was not the harmless about time part those people
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 11:01:37AM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 05:52:04PM -0500, Joseph Carter wrote:
Richard's comment was apparently on the order of It's about time,
which apparently managed to peeve the KDE people who felt they
needed to flame him publicly over
On Fri 08 Sep 2000, Paul Seelig wrote:
about. They IMHO righfully complained about RMS' forgiving talk
which is more like religious speech from a church or something.
If the catholic pope would utter such words it could be silently
ignored, though it would be appropriate speech in his
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 11:29:37AM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Fri 08 Sep 2000, Paul Seelig wrote:
RMS should IMHO publically apologize with the KDE people for this
condescending part of his otherwise correct article. He should be
So now _you_ are telling someone to ask for
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 08:24:30PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
[ just more of the same ]
because of the long and bitter public debates, RMS had to say something
and he had to make a public statement that it was now OK for KDE to use
any FSF owned code. if he had just ignored the fact that the
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 11:01:37AM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
Richard's comment was apparently on the order of It's about time, which
apparently managed to peeve the KDE people who felt they needed to flame
him publicly over it.. *sigh*
It was not the harmless about time part those
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 11:56:06AM +0200, Paul Seelig wrote:
Without being a KDE/Qt user myself, this is what makes me understand
the anger of the KDE developers.
The problem with that is that the KDE developers have chosen to assume
that because Richard has been an ass to them (and quite
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But RMS speaking like *this* is rather unappropriate and IMHO quite
insulting. I wonder if the author of ncftp who was hurting the GPL by
using readline and who subsequently put ncftp under GPL as consequence
of complaints was asked to beg for being
At 10:14 AM 9/8/00 -0400, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
Paul Seelig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But RMS speaking like *this* is rather unappropriate and IMHO quite
insulting. I wonder if the author of ncftp who was hurting the GPL by
using readline and who subsequently put ncftp under GPL as
Hello everybody
First I would like to give my appologies, I was not aware of the incomming
directory and I have been told that kde will be included. I would also like
to say that I personally do not use kde nor am a developer for them, my
consern was with the conflicts between linux. Competition
16 matches
Mail list logo
