On Wednesday 24 October 2007 05:42:57 pm Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 11182 March 1977, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Thoughts? Flames? Let me have it! :)
Let's just switch to postfix, exim is way too much complex for most
applications.
No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:42:57PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Something like nullmailer or ssmtp.
Sadly, both of those are pretty crappy.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
derivatives is
going to agree on a preferred mta (Debian has traditionally preferred
exim4, while Ubuntu traditionally has preferred postfix, just to name a
few), it has been suggested to add a meta package (called
default-mail-transport-agent or something to that effect) that each
distribution can
On Oct 24, Soren Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thoughts? Flames? Let me have it! :)
Let's just switch to postfix, exim is way too much complex for most
applications.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 11182 March 1977, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Thoughts? Flames? Let me have it! :)
Let's just switch to postfix, exim is way too much complex for most
applications.
No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move the exim
maintainer sure would love :), less bugreports), the only
Hi Joerg,
* Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-24 17:44]:
On 11182 March 1977, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Thoughts? Flames? Let me have it! :)
Let's just switch to postfix, exim is way too much complex for most
applications.
No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move
also sprach Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.10.24.1742 +0200]:
No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move the exim
maintainer sure would love :), less bugreports), the only good option is
to use a package that does not listen on any interface by default and
just does
* Joerg Jaspert [Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:42:57 +0200]:
No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move the exim
maintainer sure would love :), less bugreports), the only good option is
to use a package that does not listen on any interface by default and
just does local delivery.
Hi,
No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move the exim
maintainer sure would love :), less bugreports), the only good option is
to use a package that does not listen on any interface by default and
just does local delivery.
[...]
Wouldn't this make it more difficult
Nico Golde schrieb:
Hi Joerg,
* Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-24 17:44]:
On 11182 March 1977, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Thoughts? Flames? Let me have it! :)
Let's just switch to postfix, exim is way too much complex for most
applications.
No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we
Hi Bernd,
* Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-24 19:04]:
No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move the exim
maintainer sure would love :), less bugreports), the only good option is
to use a package that does not listen on any interface by default and
just does
On 24-Oct-07, 11:52 (CDT), martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also sprach Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.10.24.1742 +0200]:
No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move the exim
maintainer sure would love :), less bugreports), the only good option is
to use a
reportbug is able to talk smtp to bugs.d.o directly, reportbug-ng allows
the user to select a MUA to edit and send the mail.
Yes that's true however the default configuration should be
changed then.
Doesn't reportbug just ask how to submit bugs while starting it the
first time? IMHO
Hi Bernd,
* Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-24 19:49]:
reportbug is able to talk smtp to bugs.d.o directly, reportbug-ng allows
the user to select a MUA to edit and send the mail.
Yes that's true however the default configuration should be
changed then.
Doesn't reportbug
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:00:20PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Just tried by doing an aptitude purge reportbug aptitude
install reportbug since I haven't installed a fresh system
for quite some time, but it didn't ask at least on this
system here.
I would imagine it's in $HOME/.reportbugrc.
Hi Daniel,
* Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-24 20:25]:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:00:20PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Just tried by doing an aptitude purge reportbug aptitude
install reportbug since I haven't installed a fresh system
for quite some time, but it didn't ask at
This one time, at band camp, Nico Golde said:
Hi Daniel,
* Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-24 20:25]:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:00:20PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Just tried by doing an aptitude purge reportbug aptitude
install reportbug since I haven't installed a fresh
Hi Stephen,
* Stephen Gran [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-24 20:35]:
This one time, at band camp, Nico Golde said:
Hi Daniel,
* Daniel Jacobowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-24 20:25]:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:00:20PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Just tried by doing an aptitude purge
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Nico Golde wrote:
The question was if you get asked how to report bugs on install this
should have nothing to do with what the user has in his home
directory.
Of course it should; reportbug needs to know who is sending the mail,
and the proper place to store that is in the
Hi Don,
* Don Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-24 20:42]:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Nico Golde wrote:
The question was if you get asked how to report bugs on install this
should have nothing to do with what the user has in his home
directory.
Of course it should; reportbug needs to know
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Nico Golde wrote:
Oh ok thank you, that explains why it didn't work here even with
deleting the config files, there is an MTA configured.
Uh... it asks you the questions even if there is an MTA configured.
Don Armstrong
--
Identical parts aren't.
-- Beach's Law
21 matches
Mail list logo
