Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue (Was: Lottery NEW queue (Re: Are libraries with bumped SONAME subject of inspection of ftpmaster or not))

2022-01-30 Thread Francesco Poli
On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 07:38:10 +0100 Andreas Tille wrote: > Am Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 01:45:11PM -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery: [...] > > The question, which keeps being raised in part > > because I don't think it's gotten a good answer, is what the basis is for > > treating copyright and licensing bugs

Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue (Was: Lottery NEW queue (Re: Are libraries with bumped SONAME subject of inspection of ftpmaster or not))

2022-01-26 Thread Philip Hands
Andreas Tille writes: ... > May be some intermediate step would be to not hide packages in NEW queue > but exposing them as an apt source. If I'm correct this is not the case > since it had certain legal consequences for the project if code with > certain non-free licenses would be downloadable

Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue (Was: Lottery NEW queue (Re: Are libraries with bumped SONAME subject of inspection of ftpmaster or not))

2022-01-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 01:45:11PM -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery: > Jonas Smedegaard writes: > > > I just don't think the solution is to ignore copyright or licensing > > statements. > > That's not the goal. The question, which keeps being raised in part > because I don't think it's gotten a good