Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey folks,
Is is possible to make the equivalent of an Architecture: any package except
that it excludes one or two specific architectures?
Basically, I'd like to be able to write, for example:
Architecture: any [!ia64]
I know I could
On 2007-08-13, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
% type-handling -n ia64
i386 darwin-i386 freebsd-i386 kfreebsd-i386 knetbsd-i386 netbsd-i386
pts seems to have problems with this:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wine.html - it at least looks quite
ugly.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Hey folks,
Is is possible to make the equivalent of an Architecture: any package except
that it excludes one or two specific architectures?
Basically, I'd like to be able to write, for example:
Architecture: any [!ia64]
I know I could specifically list supported architectures, but I don't
Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is is possible to make the equivalent of an Architecture: any package except
that it excludes one or two specific architectures?
I think the best you can do is to write a check for that specific
architecture in the package's preinst script, and
* Reinhard Tartler [Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:27:50 +0200]:
Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is is possible to make the equivalent of an Architecture: any package
except
that it excludes one or two specific architectures?
I think the best you can do is to write a check for that
Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is is possible to make the equivalent of an Architecture: any package
except
that it excludes one or two specific architectures?
* Reinhard Tartler [Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:27:50 +0200]:
I think the best you can do is to write a check for
On Sunday 12 August 2007 13:35:02 Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Reinhard Tartler [Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:27:50 +0200]:
Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is is possible to make the equivalent of an Architecture: any package
except that it excludes one or two specific architectures?
I
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 05:43:27PM -0600, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
On Sunday 12 August 2007 13:35:02 Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Reinhard Tartler [Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:27:50 +0200]:
Wesley J. Landaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is is possible to make the equivalent of an Architecture: any
On Sunday 12 August 2007 19:13:38 Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 05:43:27PM -0600, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
Won't this then prevent the package from migrating to testing, because
it's arch: any, but failing to build on a release arch?
and remove the binaries from unstable.
9 matches
Mail list logo