Sure I do understand how things work. I'm not suggesting that ALL discussions
need be public - specifically I was not meaning deliberations on any given
case.
But I do think that general policy discussions should involve the entire debian
community - as is done for Debian Policy Manual.
Steve Robbins dijo [Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 01:15:35PM -0600]:
> (...)
> To me, one of the puzzling aspects is why the FTP policy work has been so
> secretive. The release team has a mailing list, tech committee has a mailing
> list. There is Debian Policy list. It doesn't seem in congruence
On Friday, March 2, 2018 11:07:39 PM CST Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, March 02, 2018 09:44:04 PM Steve Robbins wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 1, 2018 6:15:08 AM CST Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > But when a submitter disagrees with a REJECT, and asks for a review,
> > > IMO submitter is entitled
3 matches
Mail list logo
