On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 8:10 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> On Sat, 23 May 2020, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>
> > I have now made a list with package name, the jar files that it
> > provides and the list of class that the jar provides.
>
> This must be scripted/scriptable though… the list for stable
On Sat, 23 May 2020, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> I have now made a list with package name, the jar files that it
> provides and the list of class that the jar provides.
This must be scripted/scriptable though… the list for stable is
pretty much fixed, but the one for unstable (which is the relevant
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 7:33 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 May 2020, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > > Or perhaps we need a webpage or wiki page generated by parsing the
> > > Contents file and listing the matching Debian package for each class
> > > or, at least, Java package (unless split
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 08:33:07PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > I remember times when such a web page (actually some autogenerated text
> > file) existed which was **extremely** helpful. I wished this would be
> > back!
> >
> > > … I just volunteerd, didn’t I?
>
> Here you are:
>
>
On Wed, 6 May 2020, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Or perhaps we need a webpage or wiki page generated by parsing the
> > Contents file and listing the matching Debian package for each class
> > or, at least, Java package (unless split across multiple packages)…
>
> I remember times when such a web
Hi Thorsten,
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 05:15:04PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > Provides or something to make it clear? I saw changes to packages adding
>
> Or perhaps we need a webpage or wiki page generated by parsing the
> Contents file and listing the matching Debian package for each class
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 6:43 AM Olek Wojnar wrote:
>
> Fellow Developers, Maintainers, and Contributors,
>
> This is a quick update on recent progress with packaging the Bazel Build
> System [1] for Debian. My involvement grew out of an urgent need for
> TensorFlow that was identified during the
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 11:23 AM Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Or perhaps we need a webpage or wiki page generated by parsing the
> Contents file and listing the matching Debian package for each class
> or, at least, Java package (unless split across multiple packages)…
>
> …
>
> …
>
> … I just
Hi Emmanuel,
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 10:03 AM Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> You can remove javax-annotation from the list, it's already packaged as
> libgeronimo-annotation-1.3-spec-java. Also error-prone and
> checker-framework provide annotations that are not required at runtime,
> patching them
On Wed, 6 May 2020, Andrej Shadura wrote:
> I wonder could we improve the package description and maybe add some
YES please, me either. Why even Geronimo, why not Jakarta’s, which
is the most latest?
> Provides or something to make it clear? I saw changes to packages adding
Or perhaps we need
Hi Olek,
Le 06/05/2020 à 07:42, Olek Wojnar a écrit :
> We have more information available, including links to RFP bugs, on our
> Workplan wiki [3]. If you have Java experience and are willing to assist
> in this effort, even packaging one of these would be a great help. If
> you also want to
Fellow Developers, Maintainers, and Contributors,
This is a quick update on recent progress with packaging the Bazel Build
System [1] for Debian. My involvement grew out of an urgent need for
TensorFlow that was identified during the recent COVID-19 Biohackathon
[2]. Upstream has been very
Hi there,
Is your business hiring?
If so, you can post your job openings to 100+ job sites at no cost for two
weeks (valid until 5pm today).
Get started with your two-week trial here if you're interested. It's pretty
straightforward, but please let me know if you have any questions.
If
Good Day,
I hope this email finds you well.
I am writing to you in regards to our recent list release, and check if you
would be interested in acquiring recently verified Top IBM WebSphere or Apache
Tomcat or Oracle WebLogic or IIS 7.5 Users List. Every contact from this
database has completed
Alexander Wirt:
> - Distribution lists for use in the Maintainer: field. We suggest
> that, with maybe some extra code, this use-case could be well served
> by the tracker.debian.org service for almost all purposes. For
> larger teams, such as the Debian Perl Group, a list on
Hi,
A Quick Follow up to you that if you are interested in *Pivotal users list*
which can help you to grow up your business campaigns?
* Specialties*: big data, cloud computing, hadoop, analytics, software,
open source software, containerization, private cloud, data science, cloud
foundry
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 08:48:54 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
Release team, here are some suggestions for binNMUs and other
wanna-build interactions:
Fixes for some earlier failures, and version skews caused by
maintainer-built binaries not being discarded:
# retry failed build with
On 17/08/15 11:07, Matthias Klose wrote:
There is now another test rebuild [2] done
with an augmented dh_makeshlibs printing cxx11 symbols in libraries [3]. No
new
bug reports were filed yet.
...
[2]
https://people.debian.org/~doko/logs/gcc5-20150813/archive-gcc-08-13-2015/
[3] deb
On 08/21/2015 01:12 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 18/08/15 00:37, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 01:46:16PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
Having done more rebuilds in Ubuntu, it would be great if you could
publish a complete list of the transitions you believe to be necessary
On 18/08/15 00:37, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 01:46:16PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
Having done more rebuilds in Ubuntu, it would be great if you could
publish a complete list of the transitions you believe to be necessary
Here's the count of source packages in Ubuntu
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:12:40PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
hunspell is one notable exception, if it does indeed need renaming (I
haven't verified)
It was already bin-NMUed without renaming 16d ago. That said, a testbuild
of LO with non-transitioned libs did NOT give me a build failure
2015-08-17 12:47 GMT+02:00 Bastien ROUCARIES roucaries.bast...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
Unstable now has GCC 5 as the default for more than two weeks. The
follow-up
transitions are in progress, however the list of transitions at [1
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
Unstable now has GCC 5 as the default for more than two weeks. The follow-up
transitions are in progress, however the list of transitions at [1] is not
exhaustive, because this only covered libraries without dependencies
Unstable now has GCC 5 as the default for more than two weeks. The follow-up
transitions are in progress, however the list of transitions at [1] is not
exhaustive, because this only covered libraries without dependencies on
libraries which need a transition. There is now another test rebuild [2
Hi Simon,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 01:46:16PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
I notice that Ubuntu has gone ahead with a lot of library renames. Did
the Ubuntu developers doing these uploads test the results, or did you
just upload and hope? One reason I have held back from doing more NMUs
is
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 13:46:16 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
I notice that Ubuntu has gone ahead with a lot of library renames. Did
the Ubuntu developers doing these uploads test the results, or did you
just upload and hope? One reason I have held back from doing more NMUs
is that for the
On 17/08/15 11:07, Matthias Klose wrote:
There seems to be a tendency to avoid transitions, where Debian doesn't have
any
reverse dependencies, or where developers analyze the library API's and come
to
the conclusion that no transition is necessary. I'm not yet sure if this is
the
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015, Matthias Klose wrote:
- having a vacation and hoping the mess is cleaned up when
you come back.
Good luck with that one in the beginning of August - my guess
is that there couldn't be worse timed transition if you want
devs to be available ;-)
Enjoy ... I will be one
Hi there,
I wanted to follow up with you and make sure you had received my email I sent a
little bit ago regarding my educational resource.
I was hoping to get in touch with someone who is responsible for the resources
section as my project would be a beneficial addition for others to refer
Hello Editor-In-Chief of Debian.com,
I am writing to follow-up with the Geek Weekly proposal email we sent to you
earlier. I wanted to confirm that you received it and to see whether this was
something you wanted to consider, or to explore in more detail. As
aforementioned, we noticed
not be good to have such replies sent instead to a public
mailing list.
I suspect Raphael instead wants to specify that public follow-up posts
(not individual replies) should go to debian-devel. The
Mail-Followup-To field is often used for this, but is not a standard
nor widely implemented
) as specifying where posts
intended individually to the author (replies) should be sent. It
would not be good to have such replies sent instead to a public
mailing list.
I suspect Raphael instead wants to specify that public follow-up posts
(not individual replies) should go to debian-devel
Further versions of this proposal will be posted on the WWW, and the address
of such revisions will be posted to both -devel and -dpkg.
Please don't do this. It is not easy for everyone on these lists to
access material on the WWW. From past experience with other groups, it
really breaks
Further versions of this proposal will be posted on the WWW, and the address
of such revisions will be posted to both -devel and -dpkg.
34 matches
Mail list logo
