Re: [Soc-coordination] GSoC project: fedmsg for the Debian infrastructure

2013-04-26 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Simon Chopin said: Quoting Stephen Gran (2013-04-25 21:17:29) This one time, at band camp, Simon Chopin said: The thing itself is based on the ZeroMQ protocol. One of the principles, up to now, of system design for the debian.org infrastructure has been

Re: GSoC project: fedmsg for the Debian infrastructure

2013-04-26 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au writes: Red Hat promotes a number of messaging solutions, I've used several of these things commercially - they publish a very interesting roadmap[1]: - - HornetQ new ultra high performance enterprise grade messaging - - MRG Messaging (based on Qpid)

GSoC project: fedmsg for the Debian infrastructure

2013-04-25 Thread Simon Chopin
Hi, Nicolas Dandrimont and I are currently working on a project proposal for the Google Summer of Code to use the messaging system written by Fedora, fedmsg[0][1], within the Debian infrastructure (some of you might have seen the various ITPs related to that on -devel). Tollef kindly pointed out

Re: GSoC project: fedmsg for the Debian infrastructure

2013-04-25 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 25/04/13 13:50, Simon Chopin wrote: Hi, Nicolas Dandrimont and I are currently working on a project proposal for the Google Summer of Code to use the messaging system written by Fedora, fedmsg[0][1], within the Debian infrastructure (some of you might have seen the various ITPs related to

Re: GSoC project: fedmsg for the Debian infrastructure

2013-04-25 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 05:34:03PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 25/04/13 13:50, Simon Chopin wrote: Hi, Nicolas Dandrimont and I are currently working on a project proposal for the Google Summer of Code to use the messaging system written by Fedora, fedmsg[0][1], within the Debian

Re: GSoC project: fedmsg for the Debian infrastructure

2013-04-25 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:44:35AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 05:34:03PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 25/04/13 13:50, Simon Chopin wrote: Hi, Nicolas Dandrimont and I are currently working on a project proposal for the Google Summer of Code to use the

Re: GSoC project: fedmsg for the Debian infrastructure

2013-04-25 Thread Simon Chopin
Quoting Daniel Pocock (2013-04-25 17:34:03) ZeroMQ is a very lightweight solution - it is brokerless (like multicast) so won't necessarily support the requirement for durable subscriptions (keeping messages queued up for clients that are disconnected)

Re: GSoC project: fedmsg for the Debian infrastructure

2013-04-25 Thread Simon Chopin
Quoting Paul Tagliamonte (2013-04-25 18:04:26) OK. It's not Bikesheading, I read the rest of the thread. I'm a bit out of order. I'm still not pleased it's still up for discussion, this puts slot allocation into a funny place where the GSoC team has to decide if we can bet on a project with

Re: GSoC project: fedmsg for the Debian infrastructure

2013-04-25 Thread Nicolas Dandrimont
* Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au [2013-04-25 17:34:03 +0200]: On 25/04/13 13:50, Simon Chopin wrote: [ description of the fedmsg project ] Questions, comments? ZeroMQ is a very lightweight solution - it is brokerless (like multicast) so won't necessarily support the requirement for

Re: GSoC project: fedmsg for the Debian infrastructure

2013-04-25 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Simon Chopin (2013-04-25 18:07:29) Quoting Daniel Pocock (2013-04-25 17:34:03) ZeroMQ is a very lightweight solution - it is brokerless (like multicast) so won't necessarily support the requirement for durable subscriptions (keeping messages queued up for clients that are

Re: GSoC project: fedmsg for the Debian infrastructure

2013-04-25 Thread Luca Filipozzi
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 07:20:09PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Quoting Simon Chopin (2013-04-25 18:07:29) Quoting Daniel Pocock (2013-04-25 17:34:03) ZeroMQ is a very lightweight solution - it is brokerless (like multicast) so won't necessarily support the requirement for durable

Re: GSoC project: fedmsg for the Debian infrastructure

2013-04-25 Thread Daniel Pocock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 25/04/13 18:07, Simon Chopin wrote: Quoting Daniel Pocock (2013-04-25 17:34:03) ZeroMQ is a very lightweight solution - it is brokerless (like multicast) so won't necessarily support the requirement for durable subscriptions (keeping

Re: GSoC project: fedmsg for the Debian infrastructure

2013-04-25 Thread Stephen Gran
Hi, This one time, at band camp, Simon Chopin said: Hi, Nicolas Dandrimont and I are currently working on a project proposal for the Google Summer of Code to use the messaging system written by Fedora, fedmsg[0][1], within the Debian infrastructure (some of you might have seen the various

Re: [Soc-coordination] GSoC project: fedmsg for the Debian infrastructure

2013-04-25 Thread Simon Chopin
Quoting Stephen Gran (2013-04-25 21:17:29) Hi, This one time, at band camp, Simon Chopin said: Hi, Nicolas Dandrimont and I are currently working on a project proposal for the Google Summer of Code to use the messaging system written by Fedora, fedmsg[0][1], within the Debian

Re: GSoC project: fedmsg for the Debian infrastructure

2013-04-25 Thread Wookey
+++ Nicolas Dandrimont [2013-04-25 19:13 +0200]: * Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au [2013-04-25 17:34:03 +0200]: - do we want to use an AMQP broker? In theory, this is an open standard like SMTP: the clients and brokers are interchangeable As Simon already said, the Fedora people have

Re: [Soc-coordination] GSoC project: fedmsg for the Debian infrastructure

2013-04-25 Thread Simon Chopin
Quoting Peter Palfrader (2013-04-25 22:49:36) On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Simon Chopin wrote: One of the principles, up to now, of system design for the debian.org infrastructure has been that it can tolerate single nodes being off line for periods of time. My understanding of ZeroMQ is that

Re: [Soc-coordination] GSoC project: fedmsg for the Debian infrastructure

2013-04-25 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Simon Chopin wrote: One of the principles, up to now, of system design for the debian.org infrastructure has been that it can tolerate single nodes being off line for periods of time. My understanding of ZeroMQ is that it doesn't do very well when the sender and the