On 09 Aug 2003 05:11:39 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ifupdown surely looks bad.
Shouldn't someone else take over the package then?
Greetings
Marc, not feeling fit to take the package, but seriously thinking
about a fork
--
-- !! No
* (Nathanael Nerode)
| However, not having enough time to chase down important bugs is no
| excuse for not reviewing simple patches to fix simple bugs, which
| doesn't take an awful lot of time at all. (It is a good excuse for not
| reviewing complicated or subtle patches.)
Once you have
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 05:34:20AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
It's not like a developer could do anything more, in these two
That being true still doesn't help non DDs to contribute.
Indeed, but it also means that they are not reasons why people should
be given accounts.
cases.
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:39:52 +0100, Andrew Suffield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:50:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
ppp *was* unmaintained, for a long period of time.
When exactly is a package (take ifupdown for
On Aug 07, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think any DD reads those? Do DDs care about Bugs with patches?
And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
ppp actually appears to be unmaintained. Many users requested essential
features like pppoa and kernel space pppoe
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 20:40, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Aug 07, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Do you think any DD reads those? Do DDs care about Bugs with patches?
And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
ppp actually appears to be unmaintained. Many users requested
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:40:18PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Aug 07, Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think any DD reads those? Do DDs care about Bugs with patches?
And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
ppp actually appears to be unmaintained. Many users
At Thu, 7 Aug 2003 18:25:27 -0400,
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
However, not having enough time to chase down important bugs is no
excuse for not reviewing simple patches to fix simple bugs, which
doesn't take an awful lot of time at all. (It is a good excuse for not
reviewing complicated or
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:25:21PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:39:52 +0100, Andrew Suffield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:50:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
ppp *was* unmaintained, for a long
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 05:34:20AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
If you actually dig into the list, you'll find that many of the bugs
with patches fall into the same category as these two. Most of the
rest actually need significant attention, not
Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:39:52 +0100, Andrew Suffield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:50:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
ppp *was* unmaintained, for a long period of time.
When
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Moin Goswin!
Goswin von Brederlow schrieb am Thursday, den 07. August 2003:
Working on boot-floppies and debian-installer is not realy fruitfull
as non-DD. cvs access goes a long way there.
I must have severe reading and parsing problems
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
access to packages with patches pending would be a start. Or a system
Try http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch .
--
You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
access to packages with patches pending would be a start.
Good grief, how easy do we have to make it?
http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch
Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
access to packages with patches pending would be a start. Or a system
Try http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch .
Still
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
access to packages with patches pending would be a start.
Good grief, how easy do we have to make it?
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:50:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
access to packages with patches pending
Andrew Suffield wrote:
glibc is even worse. It has multiple maintainers, and they still don't
have enough time to chase down all the important bugs, let alone
insignificant ones like this.
This is unfortunately true; glibc seems to be severely broken on a
routine basis upstream. Kinda makes me
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:25:27PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Andrew Suffield wrote:
glibc is even worse. It has multiple maintainers, and they still don't
have enough time to chase down all the important bugs, let alone
insignificant ones like this.
This is unfortunately true; glibc
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:52:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good grief, how easy do we have to make it?
http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=whateverinclude=patch
See the form at
Andrew Suffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:50:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:52:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good grief, how easy do we have to make it?
http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch
22 matches
Mail list logo
