On 2015-07-13 14:27:07 +0200 (+0200), Michael Prokop wrote:
[...]
And JFTR: 'git review -d $ID' (available via Debian package
git-review) lets you download the specified patchset locally for
diffing etc, so only for commenting and/or the {+-}{1,2} actions
towards gerrit you'd need to use the
❦ 10 juillet 2015 22:00 GMT, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org :
Simulating Gerrit's behaviors in this regard would probably not
satisfy the desire for a replacement for pull requests however
since Gerrit assumes a LKML-esque rebase your patch until you get
it right approach rather than the
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
Ben Finney writes (Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible
with Git ‘request-pull ’):
My reading of URL:https://developer.github.com/v3/#authentication
leads me to infer there's no way for to submit a GitHub “pull
request
Ben Finney writes (Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible with
Git ‘request-pull ’):
My reading of URL:https://developer.github.com/v3/#authentication
leads me to infer there's no way for to submit a GitHub “pull request”
without having a GitHub account.
Decentralisation
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 06:12:26PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
Ben Finney writes (Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible
with Git ‘request-pull ’):
My reading of URL:https://developer.github.com/v3/#authentication
leads me to infer there's no way for to submit a GitHub “pull
On 2015-07-11 22:32:31 -0300 (-0300), Antonio Terceiro wrote:
I have a few ideas about this. I have used gerrit before, and it
provides a really nice experience except for 2 little facts:
- you have to use a web UI thingy to review patches (although that said
web UI does have a really nice
Ben Finney writes (Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible with
Git ‘request-pull ’):
A putative decentralised [0] Git pull request feature would IMO require
that anyone with a Git repository can submit a pull request to any
other, without any registration on a privileged
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
I want mentors.debian.net to accept git am formated patch / or a
debdiff against any packaging =) that would cover 90% of my review
needs in debian.
debexpo needs people to rewrite it using a non-deprecated framework,
as well as
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 at 02:06 Dimitri John Ledkov
dimitri.led...@surgut.co.uk wrote:
The problem with all of these they are still centralised. gerrit is
slightly better, as it stores all the review details as git notes, and
thus one can migrate them away without any loss of information.
Are
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
Dimitri John Ledkov writes:
What you have described here is github pull requests =) […]
Except that (a) we don't have an implementation of the server side (b)
a person who wants to submit a github pull request needs to push
buttons on the
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
I realise I'm coming to this conversation late, but:
I have some experience of writing a stunt git push receiver. I would
be willing to write another.
The rough shape would be something like:
* Instead of doing git-request-pull,
Philip Hands writes (Re: GitHub “pull request” is proprietary, incompatible
with Git ‘request-pull ’):
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes:
(It may be that there is already some software that does this. If so
I'm not aware of it.)
Having just been using it for pushing
I realise I'm coming to this conversation late, but:
I have some experience of writing a stunt git push receiver. I would
be willing to write another.
The rough shape would be something like:
* Instead of doing git-request-pull, submitter does git push to some
special URL (perhaps an ssh
On 10 July 2015 at 15:38, Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote:
I realise I'm coming to this conversation late, but:
I have some experience of writing a stunt git push receiver. I would
be willing to write another.
The rough shape would be something like:
* Instead of doing
On 2015-07-10 16:55:23 +0100 (+0100), Ian Jackson wrote:
[...]
I was aware that gerrit has something a bit like this.
But this:
https://github.com/openstack-infra/git-review
https://packages.debian.org/git-review
is a submission tool. It doesn't do the server side.
I don't
]] Paul Wise
Also accept contributions via email or git request-pull.
How do I set up a service to accept git request-pull pull requests into
a workflow? There does not seem to be any protocol associated with it,
so «accept contributions via git request-pull» seems underspecified.
--
Tollef
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 08:12 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Paul Wise
Also accept contributions via email or git request-pull.
How do I set up a service to accept git request-pull pull requests into
a workflow? There does not seem to be any protocol associated with it,
so «accept
]] Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 08:12 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Paul Wise
Also accept contributions via email or git request-pull.
How do I set up a service to accept git request-pull pull requests into
a workflow? There does not seem to be any protocol associated
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 11:31 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 08:12 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Paul Wise
Also accept contributions via email or git request-pull.
How do I set up a service to accept git request-pull pull requests into
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 12:13:32PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
To those of you who are willing to use github for Debian related
things, it would be great if you could:
Mirror the repositories to alioth so Debian has a backup.
I'd rather see it the other way around: advertise the alioth Git repo
Stefano Zacchiroli z...@debian.org writes:
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 12:13:32PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
To those of you who are willing to use github for Debian related
things, it would be great if you could:
Mirror the repositories to alioth so Debian has a backup.
I'd rather see it the
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 12:13:32PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
I mirror the repositories on my own publicly-accessible Git server.
Hopefully that's good enough. :)
If those are Debian related, I'd still suggest
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 05:55:17PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
Sometimes I wonder if people think free software is so fragile that if
anyone who works on it ever touches non-free software, everything we
built will crumble. I think our community and ecosystem is a lot more
robust than that.
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Everyone's willing to make tradeoffs on our freedom. It's what tradeoffs
we make, that's the question.
To those of you who are willing to use github for Debian related
things, it would be great if you could:
Mirror the repositories to
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
Yet it is exactly those lock-in features that is the basis for
arguments to put special effort into the centralised single point of
failure.
For example, the centralised proprietary GitHub “pull request”
25 matches
Mail list logo
