On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
Ok, makes sense, will look if the needed info is in UDD and fix the
madison CGI if so.
CGI fixed just now.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I want rmadison to be a remote madison, meaning a remote dak ls… which
is what it's supposed to be! That means behaving like dak ls, and
showing what matters, that is: not the extra sources.
I hope it clarifies the above correctness
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Possibly anything popping up in Built-Using. Random example:
kibi@arya:~$ \rmadison busybox -s stable,testing,unstable
Looks correct:
pabs@quantz:~$ zcat
/srv/mirrors/debian/dists/{stable,testing,unstable}/main/source/Sources.gz
|
Paul Wise p...@debian.org (2013-07-23):
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Possibly anything popping up in Built-Using. Random example:
kibi@arya:~$ \rmadison busybox -s stable,testing,unstable
Looks correct:
pabs@quantz:~$ zcat
On 07/23/2013 09:03, Paul Wise wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I've just noticed that #699268 is supposed to be fixed, but last I heard
about somebody from QA, that was during the last stages of the wheezy
release cycle, and while the issue was known back then,
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 20:42 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
Does anybody know what is going on with grub in testing? I have been
waiting for 2.00, but it seems to be stuck at 1.99. Grub-common at
http://packages.debian.org/jessie/grub-common shows
Hi!
* Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org [130723 11:11]:
[..]
Please also not that the additional source packages included can be at a
*higher* version than sources included in src_association. This is what
happened here: grub2_1.99-27+deb7u1 is in jessie, however a package
embedding a newer
On 2013-07-22 Carl Johnson ca...@peak.org wrote:
Does anybody know what is going on with grub in testing? I have been
waiting for 2.00, but it seems to be stuck at 1.99. Grub-common at
http://packages.debian.org/jessie/grub-common shows that it is at
1.99-27+deb7u1, but the source files show
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 20:42 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
Does anybody know what is going on with grub in testing? I have been
waiting for 2.00, but it seems to be stuck at 1.99. Grub-common at
http://packages.debian.org/jessie/grub-common shows that it is at
1.99-27+deb7u1, but the source
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 07:36:22AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The migration notification is in error; it's a bug in the script that
generates the notifications, that doesn't ignore extra entries included
in the Sources files added by the archive management software in order
to help with
Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name (2013-07-22):
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 07:36:22AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The migration notification is in error; it's a bug in the script that
generates the notifications, that doesn't ignore extra entries included
in the Sources files added by the
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:03:48AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Trust dak instead:
| kibi@arya:~$ ssh release.debian.org dak ls grub2 -s testing
Permission denied (publickey).
--
WBR, wRAR
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Andrey Rahmatullin w...@wrar.name (2013-07-22):
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:03:48AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Trust dak instead:
| kibi@arya:~$ ssh release.debian.org dak ls grub2 -s testing
Permission denied (publickey).
For those having missed [1,2], how much time exactly does one need
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:02:10AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Trust dak instead:
| kibi@arya:~$ ssh release.debian.org dak ls grub2 -s testing
Permission denied (publickey).
For those having missed [1,2], how much time exactly does one need
to find coccia.d.o on machines.cgi[3]?
Hmm,
dak on coccia.d.o is not in the best shape (yet):
$ dak rm -nR ruby-activesupport-2.3
Working...W: couldn't open '/srv/
ftp-master.debian.org/ftp//pool/main//r/ruby-activesupport-2.3/ruby-activesupport-2.3_2.3.14-7.dsc
'.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/bin/dak, line
Hi,
On 07/22/2013 12:57, Ondřej Surý wrote:
dak on coccia.d.o is not in the best shape (yet):
$ dak rm -nR ruby-activesupport-2.3
[...]
daklib.dak_exceptions.CantOpenError:
/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/ftp//pool/main//r/ruby-activesupport-2.3/ruby-activesupport-2.3_2.3.14-7_all.deb
Changes
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
On 07/22/2013 12:57, Ondřej Surý wrote:
dak on coccia.d.o is not in the best shape (yet):
$ dak rm -nR ruby-activesupport-2.3
[...]
daklib.dak_exceptions.CantOpenError:
/srv/
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
rmadison now defaults to querying UDD by default
There is a projectb mirror accessible from qa.d.o, so we could rewire
the madison CGI to look at that. It is written in Perl though so it is
unlikely I'll ever be motivated to do that.
(Adding -qa@ to the loop.)
Paul Wise p...@debian.org (2013-07-22):
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
rmadison now defaults to querying UDD by default
There is a projectb mirror accessible from qa.d.o, so we could rewire
the madison CGI to look at that. It is
Does anybody know what is going on with grub in testing? I have been
waiting for 2.00, but it seems to be stuck at 1.99. Grub-common at
http://packages.debian.org/jessie/grub-common shows that it is at
1.99-27+deb7u1, but the source files show 2.00-14. The qa page at
20 matches
Mail list logo
