On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:33:52PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
I'm curious, for instance, as to why emacs20 hasn't managed to be removed
yet.
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Perhaps the maintainer hasn't requested its removal? I don't see a bug
report open against ftp.debian.org.
I seem to remember
Quoting Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:33:52PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
I'm curious, for instance, as to why emacs20 hasn't managed to be removed
yet.
Perhaps the maintainer hasn't requested its removal? I don't see a bug
report open against
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:54:17AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
I seem to remember him requesting it. Further, you'll see on the RC bugs
list
that it's listed as REMOVE (and has been for a while). Perhaps the bug
report was already closed (because the archive maintenance scripts are
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Quoting Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:33:52PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
I'm curious, for instance, as to why emacs20 hasn't managed to be removed
yet.
Perhaps the maintainer hasn't requested its removal?
Quoting Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Quoting Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:33:52PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
I'm curious, for instance, as to why emacs20 hasn't managed to be
removed
yet.
Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone please tell me how to make Home and End to work as they
did in emacs20, both in console and X?
(global-set-key [home] 'beginning-of-buffer)
(global-set-key [?\e ?\[ ?1 ?~] 'beginning-of-buffer)
(global-set-key [end]
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:54:17AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Perhaps the maintainer hasn't requested its removal? I don't see a bug
report open against ftp.debian.org.
I seem to remember him requesting it. Further, you'll see on the RC bugs
list that it's listed
Quoting Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au:
The RC bug list REMOVE tags mean remove from testing (not unstable).
If a bug's filed against ftp.d.o, there's no trying -- it'll be removed,
and any packages that depend on it will be left broken.
BTW, in any case, If we want to stop
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathanael Nerode) writes:
Without, that is, installing every package in Debian.
I'm curious, for instance, as to why emacs20 hasn't managed to be removed
yet. Presumably something depends on it. But I can't figure out what.
apt-get -u install emacs20- will tell you what
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 05:56:24PM +0100, J?r?me Marant wrote:
The RC bug list REMOVE tags mean remove from testing (not unstable).
If a bug's filed against ftp.d.o, there's no trying -- it'll be removed,
and any packages that depend on it will be left broken.
BTW, in any case, If we want
Without, that is, installing every package in Debian.
I'm curious, for instance, as to why emacs20 hasn't managed to be removed
yet. Presumably something depends on it. But I can't figure out what.
--
Nathanael Nerode neroden at gcc.gnu.org
http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:33:52PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Without, that is, installing every package in Debian.
I'm curious, for instance, as to why emacs20 hasn't managed to be removed
yet. Presumably something depends on it. But I can't figure out what.
aptitude or deborphan
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Without, that is, installing every package in Debian.
I'm curious, for instance, as to why emacs20 hasn't managed to be
removed yet. Presumably something depends on it. But I can't figure
out what.
`apt-cache showpkg emacs20`
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Without, that is, installing every package in Debian.
I'm curious, for instance, as to why emacs20 hasn't managed to be
removed yet. Presumably something depends on it. But I can't figure
out what.
apt-cache rdepends package
--
Russ Allbery
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:33:52 -0500 Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Without, that is, installing every package in Debian.
I'm curious, for instance, as to why emacs20 hasn't managed to be removed
yet. Presumably something depends on it. But I can't figure out what.
apt-get remove --purge package
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Without, that is, installing every package in Debian.
I'm curious, for instance, as to why emacs20 hasn't managed to be removed
yet. Presumably something depends on it. But I can't figure out what.
sledge:~$ apt-cache showpkg emacs20
Package: emacs20
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 06:33:52PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
I'm curious, for instance, as to why emacs20 hasn't managed to be removed
yet.
Perhaps the maintainer hasn't requested its removal? I don't see a bug
report open against ftp.debian.org.
--
- mdz
17 matches
Mail list logo
