Re: ITP: Sword, GnomeSword

2000-09-10 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, David Starner wrote: If the program needs one to run, then at least one should be packaged. I'd prefer not to see a lot of installers that download free software - the one's that download non-free stuff are annoying and cause enough problems as it is. Sure. Probably the

ITP: Sword, GnomeSword

2000-09-09 Thread Ben Armstrong
I'd like to package Sword and GnomeSword: http://www.crosswire.org/ http://gnomesword.sourceforge.net/ These are Bible study tools. The Sword project has a lot of large data files: ftp://ftp.crosswire.org/pub/sword/modules/raw/ I could wait for the data section to be

Re: ITP: Sword, GnomeSword

2000-09-09 Thread David Starner
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 06:01:20PM +, Ben Armstrong wrote: The Sword project has a lot of large data files: ftp://ftp.crosswire.org/pub/sword/modules/raw/ I could wait for the data section to be created, or just supply an installer for Sword modules that downloads them installs

Re: ITP: Sword, GnomeSword

2000-09-09 Thread Robert D. Hilliard
Ben Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I could wait for the data section to be created, or just supply an installer for Sword modules that downloads them installs them. (Or both.) The data section was approved by the policy group a long time ago, but has never been implemented. I