On 06.03.2013 00:20, Steve Langasek wrote:
FWIW, I agree with Andrew that this isn't an interface change; this is a
latent bug in the avahi hook which has merely been exposed by this behavior
change in ifupdown. ifupdown supports more address families than ipv4 and
ipv6 (specifically, it
Hi,
On 06.03.2013 15:21, Andrew Shadura wrote:
Hello.
On 6 March 2013 13:45, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote:
A quick grep over all unpacked packages shipping ifupdown hooks show 60
hook scripts which don't have ADDRFAM set.
I haven't checked them individually, though.
They usually
Hello,
On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 20:26:47 +0100
Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote:
On 6 March 2013 13:45, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote:
A quick grep over all unpacked packages shipping ifupdown hooks
show 60 hook scripts which don't have ADDRFAM set.
I haven't checked them
Hi,
while investigating on #699749 (which apparently affects many machines
using NM, but not all of them), I discovered that the interface for
ifupdown hooks has changed since squeeze.
From the manpage:
When ifupdown is being called with the --all option, before doing any‐
thing
Hi Joss,
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:39:45PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
while investigating on #699749 (which apparently affects many machines
using NM, but not all of them), I discovered that the interface for
ifupdown hooks has changed since squeeze.
From the manpage:
When
5 matches
Mail list logo
