On Sun, 2022-12-11 at 16:47 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Could you give some arguents for your feeling.
See the posts I made in this and earlier threads:
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/4363a2435e61bf351c7d3605136c3652118eae2f.ca...@debian.org
Hi,
On 12/11/22 16:47, Andreas Tille wrote:
May be I interpreted
posts in this thread wrongly but I read it like serious is a to high
severity. Moreover what does this mean for other packages where
configure.ac is missing?
It depends on the licence, to some extent.
The GPL's definition of
Hi Andreas,
Hi Andreas,
Am Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 11:41:11AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Metzler:
I have given this a a little bit of time. This seems to work:
1. Copy configure.ac from upstream's 2.3.2h2 branch.
Seems in tag 2.3.2h2 happened what I tried with 2.3.2[1] at least
the resulting
Am Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 10:43:37AM -0500 schrieb Boyuan Yang:
>
> Not sure if it is the root cause, but there's an obvious typo with quote at
> L12:
> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/hmmer2/-/blob/423388accbb8c622edb663c845f1f5a6336256e1/debian/rules#L12
> .
Ahhh, thanks - I was seeking for
Hi Paul,
Am Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 12:21:18PM +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
> > So far for the actual case (bug report in CC).
> >
> > For the general case I somehow understand the consensus here on the list
> > that a missing configure.ac can be considered a bug but the severity
> > serious is not
Hi,
在 2022-12-11星期日的 16:35 +0100，Andreas Tille写道：
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Am Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 11:41:11AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Metzler:
> >
> > I have given this a a little bit of time. This seems to work:
> >
> > 1. Copy configure.ac from upstream's 2.3.2h2 branch.
>
> Seems in tag 2.3.2h2
Hi Andreas,
Am Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 11:41:11AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Metzler:
>
> I have given this a a little bit of time. This seems to work:
>
> 1. Copy configure.ac from upstream's 2.3.2h2 branch.
Seems in tag 2.3.2h2 happened what I tried with 2.3.2[1] at least
the resulting configure.ac
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will
On Sat, 2022-12-10 at 10:28 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> So far for the actual case (bug report in CC).
>
> For the general case I somehow understand the consensus here on the list
> that a missing configure.ac can be considered a bug but the severity
> serious is not really rectified. If I
Andreas Tille writes:
> For the general case I somehow understand the consensus here on the list
> that a missing configure.ac can be considered a bug but the severity
> serious is not really rectified. If I understood this correctly I would
> reset the severity to important at the beginning of
On 2022-12-09 Andreas Tille wrote:
[...]
> Thanks to Alexander Sulfrian who pointed out the Git repository
> featuring old tags that were obviously taken over from SVN I was proven
> wrong with the statement that there is no configure.ac any more.
> Unfortunately this is no simple drop-in with
Am Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 11:58:56AM -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> The real problem in this case is less about the DFSG and more about the
> practical problems of maintaining Debian as a software distribution: if we
> can't regenerate configure using software in Debian, there are a lot of
> porting
On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 13:14 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source
[Short-winded way of saying something similar to Russ]
In general I don't think such a situation meets DFSG item 2 nor the
GPL "preferred form for modi
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 11:58:56AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bart Martens writes:
>
> > That file may be available online for this particular software. The
> > debate is about whether such configure.ac file must be included in the
> > distributed package for making the package dfsg. And more
On 2022-12-09 at 14:58, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bart Martens writes:
>
>> That file may be available online for this particular software.
>> The debate is about whether such configure.ac file must be included
>> in the distributed package for making the package dfsg. And more in
>> general, about
Bart Martens writes:
> That file may be available online for this particular software. The
> debate is about whether such configure.ac file must be included in the
> distributed package for making the package dfsg. And more in general,
> about where to draw the line on how easily editable
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 04:07:30PM +0100, Alexander Sulfrian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 01:14:40PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I would consider asking upstream about this for sure but the code is in
> > maintenance mode and there is no Git repository to step back in history.
> >
Hi Marco
Am Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 03:33:38PM +0100 schrieb Marco d'Itri:
> On Dec 09, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > I would consider asking upstream about this for sure but the code is in
> > maintenance mode and there is no Git repository to step back in history.
> > The only way to go would be to
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 01:14:40PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I would consider asking upstream about this for sure but the code is in
> maintenance mode and there is no Git repository to step back in history.
> The only way to go would be to take configure.ac from a later version
> and
On Dec 09, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I would consider asking upstream about this for sure but the code is in
> maintenance mode and there is no Git repository to step back in history.
> The only way to go would be to take configure.ac from a later version
> and find out how it can be tweaked to
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 01:14:40PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> This "prominent" example was heavily discussed and IMHO its not really
> an example for the current case. If you look at the configure file of
> hmmer2[1] it surely claims that it is autogenerated. However, its
>
Hi Helmut,
IMHO this should be discussed more widely.
Am Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 08:09:22PM +0100 schrieb Helmut Grohne:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 05:56:18PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I agree that this configure script looks auto generated but IMHO it can
> >
22 matches
Mail list logo
