Re: Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source (Was: Bug#1025739: hmmer2: missing source for configure)

2022-12-11 Thread Philip Rinn
Hi Andreas, Hi Andreas, Am Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 11:41:11AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Metzler: I have given this a a little bit of time. This seems to work: 1. Copy configure.ac from upstream's 2.3.2h2 branch. Seems in tag 2.3.2h2 happened what I tried with 2.3.2[1] at least the resulting

Re: Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source (Was: Bug#1025739: hmmer2: missing source for configure)

2022-12-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Am Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 10:43:37AM -0500 schrieb Boyuan Yang: > > Not sure if it is the root cause, but there's an obvious typo with quote at > L12: > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/hmmer2/-/blob/423388accbb8c622edb663c845f1f5a6336256e1/debian/rules#L12 > . Ahhh, thanks - I was seeking for

Re: Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source (Was: Bug#1025739: hmmer2: missing source for configure)

2022-12-11 Thread Boyuan Yang
Hi, 在 2022-12-11星期日的 16:35 +0100,Andreas Tille写道: > Hi Andreas, > > Am Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 11:41:11AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Metzler: > > > > I have given this a a little bit of time. This seems to work: > > > > 1. Copy configure.ac from upstream's 2.3.2h2 branch. > > Seems in tag 2.3.2h2

Re: Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source (Was: Bug#1025739: hmmer2: missing source for configure)

2022-12-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Andreas, Am Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 11:41:11AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Metzler: > > I have given this a a little bit of time. This seems to work: > > 1. Copy configure.ac from upstream's 2.3.2h2 branch. Seems in tag 2.3.2h2 happened what I tried with 2.3.2[1] at least the resulting configure.ac

Re: Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source (Was: Bug#1025739: hmmer2: missing source for configure)

2022-12-10 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2022-12-09 Andreas Tille wrote: [...] > Thanks to Alexander Sulfrian who pointed out the Git repository > featuring old tags that were obviously taken over from SVN I was proven > wrong with the statement that there is no configure.ac any more. > Unfortunately this is no simple drop-in with

Re: Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source (Was: Bug#1025739: hmmer2: missing source for configure)

2022-12-09 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2022-12-09 at 13:14 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source [Short-winded way of saying something similar to Russ] In general I don't think such a situation meets DFSG item 2 nor the GPL "preferred form for modification", for the

Re: Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source (Was: Bug#1025739: hmmer2: missing source for configure)

2022-12-09 Thread Bart Martens
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 04:07:30PM +0100, Alexander Sulfrian wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 01:14:40PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I would consider asking upstream about this for sure but the code is in > > maintenance mode and there is no Git repository to step back in history. > >

Re: Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source (Was: Bug#1025739: hmmer2: missing source for configure)

2022-12-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Marco Am Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 03:33:38PM +0100 schrieb Marco d'Itri: > On Dec 09, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > I would consider asking upstream about this for sure but the code is in > > maintenance mode and there is no Git repository to step back in history. > > The only way to go would be to

Re: Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source (Was: Bug#1025739: hmmer2: missing source for configure)

2022-12-09 Thread Alexander Sulfrian
Hi, On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 01:14:40PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I would consider asking upstream about this for sure but the code is in > maintenance mode and there is no Git repository to step back in history. > The only way to go would be to take configure.ac from a later version > and

Re: Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source (Was: Bug#1025739: hmmer2: missing source for configure)

2022-12-09 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Dec 09, Andreas Tille wrote: > I would consider asking upstream about this for sure but the code is in > maintenance mode and there is no Git repository to step back in history. > The only way to go would be to take configure.ac from a later version > and find out how it can be tweaked to

Re: Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source (Was: Bug#1025739: hmmer2: missing source for configure)

2022-12-09 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Andreas, On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 01:14:40PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > This "prominent" example was heavily discussed and IMHO its not really > an example for the current case. If you look at the configure file of > hmmer2[1] it surely claims that it is autogenerated. However, its >

Is an autogenerated configure shell script non-editable source (Was: Bug#1025739: hmmer2: missing source for configure)

2022-12-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Helmut, IMHO this should be discussed more widely. Am Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 08:09:22PM +0100 schrieb Helmut Grohne: > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 05:56:18PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I agree that this configure script looks auto generated but IMHO it can > >