Hi Charles,
On 10-04-13 00:56, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 05:54:14PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
Suggestion #3: have a system where any other DD can review
a package in the NEW queue, not only the FTP masters or the
FTP assistants.
That would include publishing the
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 09.04.2013, 17:54 +0200 schrieb Bernd Zeimetz:
Suggestion #3: have a system where any other DD can review
a package in the NEW queue, not only the FTP masters or the
FTP assistants.
That would include publishing the contents of the NEW queue,
at least to all Debian
* Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org [2013-04-10 10:13:25 +0200]:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 09.04.2013, 17:54 +0200 schrieb Bernd Zeimetz:
Suggestion #3: have a system where any other DD can review
a package in the NEW queue, not only the FTP masters or the
FTP assistants.
That
On 04/10/2013 05:36 PM, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
The first point has been handled by zack, and we have on hand a legal
document,
vetted by SFLC lawyers, that makes the mentors platform a DMCA safe harbor.
Does it mean that it is mandatory that mentors is hosted in USA?
Thomas
--
To
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:11:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 04/10/2013 05:36 PM, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
The first point has been handled by zack, and we have on hand a legal
document,
vetted by SFLC lawyers, that makes the mentors platform a DMCA safe
harbor.
Does it mean
]] Jonathan Dowland
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:11:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 04/10/2013 05:36 PM, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
The first point has been handled by zack, and we have on hand a legal
document,
vetted by SFLC lawyers, that makes the mentors platform a DMCA safe
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:11:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 04/10/2013 05:36 PM, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
The first point has been handled by zack, and we have on hand a legal
document,
vetted by SFLC lawyers, that makes the mentors platform a DMCA safe
harbor.
Does it mean
Le Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:36:03AM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont a écrit :
For mentors.debian.net, there are two main blockers for a .org transition:
- Seeking an answer to this redistribution without verification problem
- Making the codebase acceptable for DSA administration
The first
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:51:39PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
- If mentors.debian.org needs to follow the DMCA, why would
mentors.debian.net be exempt of it ?
It's not, but Debian is not hosting mentors, the .net domain is a forwarding
service
of sorts, so to take on the responsibility
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 03:37:39PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:11:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 04/10/2013 05:36 PM, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
The first point has been handled by zack, and we have on hand a legal
document,
vetted by SFLC lawyers,
[Charles Plessy]
- If mentors.debian.org needs to follow the DMCA, why would
mentors.debian.net be exempt of it ?
It's not exempt, but it's also not Debian's problem.
- If mentors.debian.org can distribute unreviewed packages by becomming a
DMCA safe harbor, wouldn't it be
Le Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:09:16PM -0500, Peter Samuelson a écrit :
- If mentors.debian.org can distribute unreviewed packages by becomming a
DMCA safe harbor, wouldn't it be possible for
ftp-master.debian.org/NEW.html ?
The difference is that one is open to the public and the
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
Le Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:36:03AM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont a écrit :
- Bonus question: since mentors.debian.net seems to be hosted in Germany,
does it mean that developers living in the US should refrain from
uploading
crypto to it ? How
Le Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 05:54:14PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
Suggestion #3: have a system where any other DD can review
a package in the NEW queue, not only the FTP masters or the
FTP assistants.
That would include publishing the contents of the NEW queue,
at least to all Debian
On 04/10/2013 06:56 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 05:54:14PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz a écrit :
Suggestion #3: have a system where any other DD can review
a package in the NEW queue, not only the FTP masters or the
FTP assistants.
That would include publishing the contents of
Charles Plessy wrote:
Conversely, the existence of sites such as Ubuntu's PPA, SourceForge, GitHub
and many others show that a large number of software providers are confident
that a policy of a posteriori removals is sufficient. I do not understand why
we do not reach the same conclusion for
16 matches
Mail list logo