I am not a lawyer either, but...
Marcus Brinkmann said:
The other comments state the difference in copyright law, if everything is
forbidden that is not explicitely allowd or if everything that is not
explicitely forbidden is allowed.
I don't really see how this applies here...
Yes, the
On Mon, Apr 27, 1998 at 11:34:00AM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcus Brinkmann) wrote on 23.04.98 in [EMAIL
PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 09:53:54AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I can tell this license is DFSG-free; please let me know if you
On Mon, Apr 27, 1998 at 11:36:00AM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adrian Bridgett) wrote on 23.04.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 09:53:54AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I can tell this license is DFSG-free; please let me know if you
On Tue, 28 Apr 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
Don't spread misinformation, please. Did we read the same license?
I quote it her for you:
Copyright (c) 1997-1998 by Armin Biere.
Author: Armin Biere.
Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any
purpose on any
Marcus Brinkmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And now my comments:
1) He does not mention that selling is allowed. So you are not allowed to
sell it.
Er, you're allowed to redistribute it freely, and there's no restriction
on selling it. What situation are you imagining where this is a problem
On Mon, Apr 27, 1998 at 11:36:00AM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
However, it is not as obvious as you want to make us believe. Things that
are not explicitely allowed are forbidden. Things that are not spelled out,
are not there at all. There is only little room for interpretation of legal
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
However, it is not as obvious as you want to make us believe. Things that
are not explicitely allowed are forbidden. Things that are not spelled out,
are not there at all. There is only little room for interpretation of legal
texts.
I think this is a matter of
On Mon, Apr 27, 1998 at 09:40:33PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
And now my comments:
1) He does not mention that selling is allowed. So you are not allowed to
sell it.
Last time I heard, redistribute freely was taken to mean that you were
Bear == Bear Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bear You're assuming that this rule applies everywhere and in
Bear every situation. In the US the assumption often goes the
Bear other way; anything not explicitly forbidden is permitted
Bear (up to the limits of lawful action, of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcus Brinkmann) wrote on 23.04.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 09:53:54AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I can tell this license is DFSG-free; please let me know if you
disagree.
This is weird, especially because of point 3.
I can see
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adrian Bridgett) wrote on 23.04.98 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 09:53:54AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I can tell this license is DFSG-free; please let me know if you
disagree.
Copyright (c) 1997-1998 by Armin Biere.
Author: Armin
On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 07:00:24PM +0100, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 09:53:54AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I can tell this license is DFSG-free; please let me know if you
disagree.
Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any
purpose on
As far as I can tell this license is DFSG-free; please let me know if you
disagree.
Copyright (c) 1997-1998 by Armin Biere.
Author: Armin Biere.
Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any
purpose on any computer system, and to redistribute it freely,
subject to the following
On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 09:53:54AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I can tell this license is DFSG-free; please let me know if you
disagree.
This is weird, especially because of point 3. He means the right thing, but
he doesn't mention modification, redistribution of modificated
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 09:53:54AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I can tell this license is DFSG-free; please let me know if you
disagree.
This is weird, especially because of point 3. He means the right thing, but
he doesn't mention modification,
On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 06:20:21PM +0200, Oliver Elphick wrote:
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 09:53:54AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I can tell this license is DFSG-free; please let me know if you
disagree.
This is weird, especially because of
16 matches
Mail list logo
