Hi Axel,
Am Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 06:01:33PM +0200 schrieb Axel Beckert:
> Andreas: Sorry if I was a bit too opposing because of assuming that
> every DD uses Unstable by default.
No need to be sorry, really not. I simply missed the point of that
change.
> (Actually I think the Dev Ref says
>
Hi again,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I'll start editing lintian-overrides then.
>
> Maybe wait a bit with that. Given Lucas' comment, I feel a bit more
> urged to provide such a migration script.
>
> I will look into this for the next upload. No promises as of now,
> though.
Hi Lucas,
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Just a note that since the last version of lintian to migrate to testing
> was 2.111 (which was also the last one to be backported to stable), some
> of us might not have updated since 2.111 and might be hit by changes
> that happened since then.
Oh, right!
On 29/06/22 at 15:49 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Correct, except that it happened for quite a while (7 months at least)
> and was (and maybe still is — see below) a continuous transition. It
> is present since at least 2.114.0 from November 2021. According to the
> git history, the implementation
Hi Samuel and Axel,
Am Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 04:10:49PM +0200 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Axel Beckert, le mer. 29 juin 2022 15:49:11 +0200, a ecrit:
> > > I consider these [] not helpful […] no visible advantage.
OK, thanks for making the advantages visible to me then. I'll
start editing
Hello,
Axel Beckert, le mer. 29 juin 2022 15:49:11 +0200, a ecrit:
> > I consider these [] not helpful […] no visible advantage.
>
> The advantage is to clearly mark what is a file with potentially a
> line number in the output of lintian so that further processors like
> the lintian website can
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille wrote:
> I realised that lintian (at least) starting with version 2.115.1 (may be
> earlier) wraps file names into [] which breaks existing
> lintian-overrides.
Correct, except that it happened for quite a while (7 months at least)
and was (and maybe still is — see
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 02:49:35PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I realised that lintian (at least) starting with version 2.115.1 (may be
> earlier) wraps file names into [] which breaks existing
> lintian-overrides. Random example:
>
>
>
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 02:49:35PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I realised that lintian (at least) starting with version 2.115.1 (may be
> earlier) wraps file names into [] which breaks existing
> lintian-overrides. Random example:
>
>
>
Hi,
I realised that lintian (at least) starting with version 2.115.1 (may be
earlier) wraps file names into [] which breaks existing
lintian-overrides. Random example:
https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/biomaj3-user/-/blob/master/debian/lintian-overrides
now becomes invalid by lintian
10 matches
Mail list logo
