Neil McGovern neilm at debian.org writes:
I absolutely do not want to see anything related to ruby on my
systems.
SC#4 and not forcing bad things on users.
Fantastic. In that case I propose we remove mksh from the archive as
From my system ≠ from the archive. I don’t say everyone
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de wrote:
In fact, I even demoted it from Recommends to Suggests on a package
because many people still run with install-recommends=true and it
was not strictly needed.
Thanks for fixing a bug in your package.
Just don't blame other
Philipp Kern pkern at debian.org writes:
I absolutely do not want to see anything related to ruby on my
systems.
How is that relevant for Debian?
SC#4 and not forcing bad things on users.
bye,
//mirabilos (at work)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 02:18:40PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Philipp Kern pkern at debian.org writes:
I absolutely do not want to see anything related to ruby on my
systems.
How is that relevant for Debian?
SC#4 and not forcing bad things on users.
Fantastic. In that case I
Am Dienstag, den 03.09.2013, 22:18 -0700 schrieb Russ Allbery:
tony mancill tmanc...@debian.org writes:
Thank you for pointing this out. I just recently uploaded a script,
splitpatch, that I argued should be accepted as-is (i.e. as a micro
package) because of the dependency on ruby.
Benjamin Drung bdrung at debian.org writes:
devscript had only Perl and Shell scripts initially, but then gained
Python scripts. I don't see any reason to not accept ruby script. ruby
would pull in another ~ 13 MB of storage, but devscripts targets
developer machines.
I absolutely do not
[Thorsten Glaser]
I absolutely do not want to see anything related to ruby on my
systems.
Why? Is this just an emotional reaction, or is it the 13 MB of
dependencies, or something else?
I wonder if anyone feels the same way about, say, libraries written in
FORTRAN, or binaries linked against
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 01:02:35PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Thorsten Glaser]
I absolutely do not want to see anything related to ruby on my
systems.
Why? Is this just an emotional reaction, or is it the 13 MB of
dependencies, or something else?
I wonder if anyone feels the same
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 01:16:12PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Benjamin Drung bdrung at debian.org writes:
devscript had only Perl and Shell scripts initially, but then gained
Python scripts. I don't see any reason to not accept ruby script. ruby
would pull in another ~ 13 MB of storage,
Peter Samuelson dixit:
I absolutely do not want to see anything related to ruby on my
systems.
Why? Is this just an emotional reaction, or is it the 13 MB of
dependencies, or something else?
Something else, mostly technical, the rest personal.
I wonder if anyone feels the same way about,
Le 02/09/2013 06:12, Paul R. Tagliamonte a écrit :
Respectfully - when we add micro (under Size 100 packages) the amount of
metadata added to every mirror and every users machine is almost as much as
the package contents.
This is a very common request (make sure this really needs to be
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Vincent Danjean wrote:
Never mind. My current problem is that I have no idea which current
package to contact to ask for a inclusion. It is not important enough
to be included in packages such as util-linux and few (no?) system/devel
packages already have a
Le 03/09/2013 11:52, Paul Wise a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Vincent Danjean wrote:
Never mind. My current problem is that I have no idea which current
package to contact to ask for a inclusion. It is not important enough
to be included in packages such as util-linux and few
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:31:35PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
Le 03/09/2013 11:52, Paul Wise a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Vincent Danjean wrote:
Never mind. My current problem is that I have no idea which current
package to contact to ask for a inclusion. It is not
Le 03/09/2013 14:50, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:31:35PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
So, I'm looking for a package that would accept this ruby script
(I will probably ask linux-util anyway if nobody has other suggestions)
and I will keep it in my perso repository
Vincent Danjean vdanjean...@free.fr writes:
The fact is that the FTP team comment was correct: it is really a small
package. So, my question was really open (I do not know every package in
Debian), in case someone has a useful suggestion (that does not involve
to rewrite the script).
On 09/03/2013 02:17 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
Vincent Danjean vdanjean...@free.fr writes:
The fact is that the FTP team comment was correct: it is really a small
package. So, my question was really open (I do not know every package in
Debian), in case someone has a useful suggestion (that does
tony mancill tmanc...@debian.org writes:
Thank you for pointing this out. I just recently uploaded a script,
splitpatch, that I argued should be accepted as-is (i.e. as a micro
package) because of the dependency on ruby.
Given that ruby is becoming more popular for scripting, what do folks
18 matches
Mail list logo
