On Wed, 2019-08-14 at 17:44 -0700, Mo Zhou wrote:
> * For a source package that produce binary package containing ML models,
> it's encouraged to write a "reproduce-original-model" that may e.g.
> download a dataset from internet and redo the same procedure to
> produce the original model.
On 2019-08-13 01:00, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 8:45 AM Sam Hartman wrote:
>
>> In cases where the model is not recreated, but where software in Debian
>> could create the model, I think a README file is better than a package
>> relationship.
>
> Personally, I'd like to see
On 2019-08-13 00:44, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> "Mo" == Mo Zhou writes:
>
>
> >> (result of running the training program with specific input data,
> >> if I understand correctly?)
>
> Mo> Yes, correct.
>
> >> The source package would need to Build-Depend on the training
>
[Debian list policy is to reply to list without CC to individuals,
except where the individual has asked for a CC.]
For the rest of your reply, I agree with Sam's response (i.e. no
Suggests is necessary).
...Marvin
* Mo Zhou [190812 20:29]:
> > The source package would need to Build-Depend on
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 8:45 AM Sam Hartman wrote:
> In cases where the model is not recreated, but where software in Debian
> could create the model, I think a README file is better than a package
> relationship.
Personally, I'd like to see Policy specify a standard mechanism that
people could
> "Mo" == Mo Zhou writes:
>> (result of running the training program with specific input data,
>> if I understand correctly?)
Mo> Yes, correct.
>> The source package would need to Build-Depend on the training
>> program and its inputs, but in general there would not
Hi Marvin,
On 2019-08-12 18:35, Marvin Renich wrote:
> * Mo Zhou [190812 10:31]:
>> To this end, I wrote the policy #5 [3]:
>>
>>A package that includes a machine learning model, must also include
>>the corresponding training program, or depend on the package that
>> provides
>>the
* Mo Zhou [190812 10:31]:
> To this end, I wrote the policy #5 [3]:
>
>A package that includes a machine learning model, must also include
>the corresponding training program, or depend on the package that
> provides
>the corresponding training program.
>
> Does that make sense? If
Hi -devel,
src:tesseract-ocr has two concrete bugs that are associated
to ML-Policy[1]. Let's discuss about the possible solution.
BTW, today I drew a diagram[2] for the ML-Policy. Those
who don't bother to read the full text could have a look
at the diagram.
-- #933878: training files are
9 matches
Mail list logo
