Odd dependancy situation with libc6 and libc6-dev

1998-10-13 Thread Ben Gertzfield
Wow. I was installing some slink packages today with dpkg on my hamm system, and I got myself into a wacky situation. I'd had the latest hamm versions of libc6 and libc6-dev (2.0.7t-1) installed. I installed the slink version of libc6 (2.0.7u-2) without a hitch. But then I realized I should have

Re: Odd dependancy situation with libc6 and libc6-dev

1998-10-13 Thread Joey Hess
FWIW, I ran into the exact same thing today and apt corrected it. Ben Gertzfield wrote: Wow. I was installing some slink packages today with dpkg on my hamm system, and I got myself into a wacky situation. I'd had the latest hamm versions of libc6 and libc6-dev (2.0.7t-1) installed. I

Re: Odd dependancy situation with libc6 and libc6-dev

1998-10-13 Thread Gergely Madarasz
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Joey Hess wrote: I'd had the latest hamm versions of libc6 and libc6-dev (2.0.7t-1) installed. I installed the slink version of libc6 (2.0.7u-2) without a hitch. But then I realized I should have been forced to upgrade libc6-dev at the same time! FWIW, I ran into