Re: Packages-arch-specific (was: Sparc build failure analysis)

2005-12-12 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 08:52 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: So I followed the instructions at the top of that file and requested a P-a-s entry, after asking people here what to do. No response. Hm. I wasn't sure what to make of that -- maybe this request is too trivial to bother with, it's fine

Re: Packages-arch-specific (was: Sparc build failure analysis)

2005-12-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 08:52:04AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 06:53:47AM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: Again: what can I do with such a list? See the list below. Changes to the P-a-s list should be sent to the contacts listed

Packages-arch-specific (was: Sparc build failure analysis)

2005-12-11 Thread Russ Allbery
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 06:53:47AM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: Again: what can I do with such a list? See the list below. Changes to the P-a-s list should be sent to the contacts listed at the top of this file

Re: Packages-arch-specific (was: Sparc build failure analysis)

2005-12-11 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Russ Allbery] Maybe the right thing to do would be to work out a way for package maintainers to provide input to their own P-a-s entries in some sort of automated fashion? It does seem like a package maintainer is generally going to know this sort of thing Could be done, but my