On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:39:12PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
If a package works, has no new upstream versions and doesn't get
outdated policywise there is no need for a new version of the package
just because we're making a new release.
The making a release may not be the best reason. But a
IMO each package should at least once per release upload a status
report. Also there was ample time for the transition of each package to
the pool. These are the reason behind the mailing to each maintainer of
packages still in Potato.
While most of the answers I got were positive, there were
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes:
IMO each package should at least once per release upload a status
report. Also there was ample time for the transition of each package to
Disagreed. We should make package uploads just to make uploads.
If a package works, has no new upstream versions and
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:39:12PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
If a package works, has no new upstream versions and doesn't get
outdated policywise there is no need for a new version of the package
just because we're making a new release.
And what makes you think there has been no new upstream
David Starner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And what makes you think there has been no new upstream versions for all
those packages?
Nothing. I commented on you general opinion.
--
Emacs er det eneste moderne styresystem der ikke er multitrådet.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Starner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:39:12PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
If a package works, has no new upstream versions and doesn't get
outdated policywise there is no need for a new version of the package
just because we're making a new release.
And what
On Wed 10 Apr 2002, Bob Hilliard wrote:
Otto Wyss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Packages: dict-easton, dict-gazetteer, dict-hitchcock
The listed packages are still located in the Potato directory,
possibly because there wasn't any update necessary during the full
Woody development phase,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:57:26PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
These packages have not needed any updates.
[...]
Is it really necessary to make a new upload, rather
than copying or linking these packages to the pool?
I will make a new upload before the woody release if it is
Otto Wyss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Packages: dict-easton, dict-gazetteer, dict-hitchcock
The listed packages are still located in the Potato directory,
possibly because there wasn't any update necessary during the full
Woody development phase, but maybe also because there is no interest
9 matches
Mail list logo
