Hi,
just have a look here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605133
Obviously there is no interest for a package manager in X any more.
So back to the roots with aptitude ... ;-)
Or maybe the idea is that Debian has to be a distribution for servers only?
Here is no response in
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
I tested d-i last week and accidentally installled GNOME. This
allowed me to confirm that GNOME does not pull Synaptic in testing.
gnome-core depends on nautilus, which recommends synaptic.
Unless such recommends are being skipped by something, it should be
installed.
Hi,
I also installed few times already wheezy with GNOME and
there was never synaptic (PackageKit was the default).
Cheers,
zlatan
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Joey Hess jo...@debian.org wrote:
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
I tested d-i last week and accidentally installled GNOME. This
2012-07-21 18:37, Joey Hess skrev:
gnome-core depends on nautilus, which recommends synaptic.
Unless such recommends are being skipped by something, it should be
installed.
nautilus (3.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
...
- Drop Recommends on synaptic and app-install-data. We no longer call
Per Olofsson wrote:
2012-07-21 18:37, Joey Hess skrev:
gnome-core depends on nautilus, which recommends synaptic.
Unless such recommends are being skipped by something, it should be
installed.
nautilus (3.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
...
- Drop Recommends on synaptic and
On 2012-06-27 11:34, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
On 2012-04-05 20:20, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
This didn't generate as much feedback as I hoped, but I filed a
ticket asking task-desktop to install synaptic:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667703
Joey Hess changed tasks to bring
On 2012-04-05 20:20, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
This didn't generate as much feedback as I hoped, but I filed a ticket
asking task-desktop to install synaptic:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667703
Joey Hess changed tasks to bring Synaptic in KDE, LXDE and Xfce. Only
the GNOME
Hi!
How odd that I didn't notice that bug... (I'm the GPK/PK maintainer)
Well, I think pulling in Synaptic on KDE might be a bad idea, probably
KDE desktop packages should pull in Apper instead, a KDE package
manager based on PackageKit and fully integrated into the KDE desktop.
It does not
Hi Matthias,
On 2012-06-27 14:54, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
Hi!
How odd that I didn't notice that bug... (I'm the GPK/PK maintainer)
Well, I think pulling in Synaptic on KDE might be a bad idea, probably
KDE desktop packages should pull in Apper instead, a KDE package
manager based on PackageKit
This didn't generate as much feedback as I hoped, but I filed a ticket
asking task-desktop to install synaptic:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667703
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi Jon,
Jon Dowland wrote:
A Debian desktop should be a superset of KDE-desktop | GNOME-desktop
| LXDE-desktop etc. + things such as a GUI package manager.
I am not sure what you mean by that, but task-desktop already looks like
what you may have in mind. It recommends task-gnome-desktop |
Hi Goswin,
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Jon Dowlandj...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:30:37PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Shouldn't there rather be a base-desktop that both KDE-desktop and
GNOME-desktop depend on? A meta package that depends on everything any
Le vendredi 30 mars 2012 à 22:12 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Gnome-desktop, not gnome. Gnome-desktop would depend on base-deskop and
gnome and maybe a few more gnome-ish things that aren't in gnome.
I’d appreciate if you could stop beating a horse that’s been dead since
before the
Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org writes:
Le vendredi 30 mars 2012 à 22:12 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
Gnome-desktop, not gnome. Gnome-desktop would depend on base-deskop and
gnome and maybe a few more gnome-ish things that aren't in gnome.
Iâd appreciate if you could stop
Le samedi 31 mars 2012 à 17:10 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
So your answere to There is no garphical package manager being
installed for the desktop is there is no problem?
It’s the KDE team’s problem. If they feel like a low-lever package
manager is not necessary for their desktop,
Hi!
As PackageKit maintainer, I would like to say that we have
GNOME-PackageKit as high-lever package manager and Synaptic as
low-level PM for GNOME, and that Apper as a high-level package manager
is available on KDE.
So, I don't really see a problem with package-managers itself here,
you would
Jon Dowland j...@debian.org writes:
On 27/03/12 17:09, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
So what do others think?
I think that we need to separate the notion of a debian desktop from
the GNOME or KDE desktops. Synaptic is probably quite rightly not
part of either, but I agree that a default desktop
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:30:37PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Shouldn't there rather be a base-desktop that both KDE-desktop and
GNOME-desktop depend on? A meta package that depends on everything any
desktop should have.
I'm not sure if that's the right direction of dependency,
Jon Dowland j...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:30:37PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Shouldn't there rather be a base-desktop that both KDE-desktop and
GNOME-desktop depend on? A meta package that depends on everything any
desktop should have.
I'm not sure if that's the
On 27/03/12 17:09, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
So what do others think?
I think that we need to separate the notion of a debian desktop from the
GNOME or KDE desktops. Synaptic is probably quite rightly not part of
either, but I agree that a default desktop via install should provide
a GUI
Hi,
3 days ago I installed wheezy on my laptop. The day after I realized
that no graphical APT front-end was installed. Usually, I just install
Synaptic as a habit, but this time I was surprised I had to do that as I
was specifically testing the completeness of our KDE meta-packages and
had
21 matches
Mail list logo
