Re: Presenting DPKG_ROOT

Hi Russ, Quoting Russ Allbery (2022-09-20 00:05:23) > Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues writes: > > in 2016 we filed our first DPKG_ROOT patch #824594 against > > base-files. The dpkg version at the time just had included support for > > the DPKG_ROOT variable being set for maintainer scripts and

Re: Presenting DPKG_ROOT

Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues writes: > in 2016 we filed our first DPKG_ROOT patch #824594 against > base-files. The dpkg version at the time just had included support for > the DPKG_ROOT variable being set for maintainer scripts and we were > excited to try out this new feature for creating

Re: Presenting DPKG_ROOT

Hi, Quoting Josh Triplett (2022-09-11 15:26:52) > Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > > What do you think? Is this the right solution to the problem? A few more > > bits > > about DPKG_ROOT as well as alternative solution proposals (including > > rejected > > ones) can be found on this

Re: Presenting DPKG_ROOT

Hi, Quoting Josh Triplett (2022-09-11 15:26:52) > Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > > What do you think? Is this the right solution to the problem? A few more > > bits > > about DPKG_ROOT as well as alternative solution proposals (including > > rejected > > ones) can be found on this

Re: Presenting DPKG_ROOT

Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > What do you think? Is this the right solution to the problem? A few more bits > about DPKG_ROOT as well as alternative solution proposals (including rejected > ones) can be found on this wiki page: > >

Presenting DPKG_ROOT

Hi, in 2016 we filed our first DPKG_ROOT patch #824594 against base-files. The dpkg version at the time just had included support for the DPKG_ROOT variable being set for maintainer scripts and we were excited to try out this new feature for creating foreign architecture chroots. At the time we