Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Don suggested to use the tags _and_ the versioning information in a
transitional period; I'm not 100% sure what this buys us, except that I'm
not sure how well britney would cope without.]
4. Run a script over the archive (like the one
Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 05:15:02PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Since our default development suite is unstable, IMHO, does make sense
to see bugs in previous versions that are solved in unstable.
Well, what do you propose as criteria for
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 12:44:40PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Don suggested to use the tags _and_ the versioning information in a
transitional period; I'm not 100% sure what this buys us, except that I'm
not sure how well
I was asked to take this on -devel to facilitate easier commenting; those of
you who read Planet Debian will probably already have read most of this on my
blog, but some of it is new and some of it is condensed.
Currently we use the tag fixed for bugs fixed in NMU, and
fixed-in-experimental for,
Steinar H. Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Don Armstrong had a different suggestion here: Make the default view show
anything applicable to unstable, _plus_ anything that is not marked as
fixed in any version. I don't believe the difference is all that
big.]
Since our
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 05:15:02PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Since our default development suite is unstable, IMHO, does make sense
to see bugs in previous versions that are solved in unstable.
Well, what do you propose as criteria for showing that? What do you mean by
previous versions --
6 matches
Mail list logo
