user j...@debian.org
usertags 692614 + good-not-evil
usertags 692619 + good-not-evil
usertags 692624 + good-not-evil
usertags 692625 + good-not-evil
usertags 692627 + good-not-evil
usertags 692628 + good-not-evil
usertags 692629 + good-not-evil
usertags 692630 + good-not-evil
usertags 692631 +
On 11/11/12 17:17, Michael Banck wrote:
So how should we proceed? Is this dire enough that we need to repackage
original tarballs, removing code under the JSON license? Or can we
postpone this after the wheezy release and only patch out the offending
code for now?
IANAL, but I believe the
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 04:25:51PM +0100, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:
Ansgar has recently made an MBF against all packages including the
problematic JSON license term The Software shall be used for Good, not
Evil. From what I've seen, most - if not all - of the affected packages
are
CCing Ansgar
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 04:25:51PM +0100, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:
Ansgar has recently made an MBF against all packages including the
problematic JSON license term The Software shall be used for Good, not
Evil.
I've found one of these - #692614 - is the whole set collected
Hi,
Ansgar has recently made an MBF against all packages including the
problematic JSON license term The Software shall be used for Good, not
Evil. From what I've seen, most - if not all - of the affected packages
are using in-source libraries copyright JSON.org, which AFAIK means
convincing a
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 04:25:51PM +0100, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:
Should we maybe try again? As Ansgar
mentioned in one bugreport, the license is considered non-free not only
by us, but by Fedora as well[1] (and it's also notOSI-recognized)
FWIW, by FSF too:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 04:25:51PM +0100, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote:
Hi,
Ansgar has recently made an MBF against all packages including the
problematic JSON license term The Software shall be used for Good, not
Evil. From what I've seen, most - if not all - of the affected packages
are
* Leo 'costela' Antunes cost...@debian.org, 2012-11-08, 16:25:
Ansgar has recently made an MBF against all packages including the
problematic JSON license term The Software shall be used for Good, not
Evil. From what I've seen, most - if not all - of the affected
packages are using in-source
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 8. November 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
As far as I can see Mr Crockford _enjoys_ being asked to change his
license. So no, please don't feed the troll.
As much as I think this licence is stupid (from my free software point of
view), I don't think he should be called a troll,
On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 19:13, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Donnerstag, 8. November 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
As far as I can see Mr Crockford _enjoys_ being asked to change his
license. So no, please don't feed the troll.
As much as I think this licence is stupid (from my free software point of
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 07:13:45PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Donnerstag, 8. November 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote:
As far as I can see Mr Crockford _enjoys_ being asked to change his
license. So no, please don't feed the troll.
As much as I think this licence is stupid (from my free
11 matches
Mail list logo
