Re: Freeze stuff, summary.. (perl 5.005, etc)

1999-05-11 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Adam It wouldn't hurt but I don't think it's necessary. glibc2.1 can Adam drop-in replace 2.0 (unless you have a program that depends on Adam certain internal stuff which it shouldn't be using anyway). Octave doesn't depend on internal stuff, but still fails when a glibc2.0 compiled

Re: Freeze stuff, summary.. (perl 5.005, etc)

1999-05-11 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Adam Di Carlo wrote: Oscar Levi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've been distracted by revenue production for a couple of months. Are we expected to upload our packages rebuilt for glibc2.1? It wouldn't hurt but I don't think it's necessary. glibc2.1 can drop-in replace 2.0 (unless you

Re: Freeze stuff, summary.. (perl 5.005, etc)

1999-05-10 Thread Oscar Levi
I've been distracted by revenue production for a couple of months. Are we expected to upload our packages rebuilt for glibc2.1?

Re: Freeze stuff, summary.. (perl 5.005, etc)

1999-05-10 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Oscar Levi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've been distracted by revenue production for a couple of months. Are we expected to upload our packages rebuilt for glibc2.1? It wouldn't hurt but I don't think it's necessary. glibc2.1 can drop-in replace 2.0 (unless you have a program that depends on

Re: Freeze stuff, summary.. (perl 5.005, etc)

1999-05-10 Thread Joseph Carter
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 02:11:42AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: I've been distracted by revenue production for a couple of months. Are we expected to upload our packages rebuilt for glibc2.1? It wouldn't hurt but I don't think it's necessary. glibc2.1 can drop-in replace 2.0 (unless you