* G. Branden Robinson:
> Perhaps the thing to do here is have, , yet another command-line
> option for GCC. The Ada language did something similar a couple of
> decades ago to tighten up the language for hard real-time demands, with
> what it called the "Ravenscar profile".[1] That proved
Oskari Pirhonen writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 16:07:45 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Gentoo has been fixing various packages for building with Clang, which
>> covers a superset of the issues that need to be addressed:
>>
>> [TRACKER] Support LLVM/Clang
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 16:07:45 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Gentoo has been fixing various packages for building with Clang, which
> covers a superset of the issues that need to be addressed:
>
> [TRACKER] Support LLVM/Clang as alternative system compiler
>
Paul Wise writes:
> On Tue, 2023-04-18 at 16:07 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> TL;DR: I want to propose a GCC 14 change which will impact
>> distributions, so I'd like to gather some feedback from Debian.
>
> Is this change being made the upstream defaults?
>
> Or will it be a distro
On Tue, 2023-04-18 at 16:07 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> TL;DR: I want to propose a GCC 14 change which will impact
> distributions, so I'd like to gather some feedback from Debian.
Is this change being made the upstream defaults?
Or will it be a distro override like the hardening flags are?
Hi!
On Tue, 2023-04-18 at 17:54:20 -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> At 2023-04-18T16:07:45+0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > TL;DR: I want to propose a GCC 14 change which will impact
> > distributions, so I'd like to gather some feedback from Debian.
> > I would appreciate some discussion on
[I am not subscribed to debian-gcc or c-std-porting]
Hi Florian,
At 2023-04-18T16:07:45+0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> TL;DR: I want to propose a GCC 14 change which will impact
> distributions, so I'd like to gather some feedback from Debian.
>
> Clang has disabled support for a few historic C
7 matches
Mail list logo
