On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 08:10:10PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
no, don't re-invent the wheel. This all make gettext. We don't need
patch apt, dpkg, other toold this way.
We must only use a old, nice and tested tool: gettext.
Nice, I wasn't aware it solves the encoding problem as well!
The
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 11:47:36AM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 08:10:10PM +0200, Michael Bramer wrote:
no, don't re-invent the wheel. This all make gettext. We don't need
patch apt, dpkg, other toold this way.
We must only use a old, nice and tested tool:
Hello,
I have been reading the DDTS thread, and seeing that it was resolving into
a each package should maintain their translation. I would like to
present what I think may be problematic in that approach :
1. This results in filing random bugs in BTS in random manner. Telling the
submitter
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 03:42:00PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
I have been reading the DDTS thread, and seeing that it was
resolving into a each package should maintain their translation. I
would like to present what I think may be problematic in that
approach :
1. This results in filing
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 03:31:49PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 03:42:00PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
I have been reading the DDTS thread, and seeing that it was
resolving into a each package should maintain their translation. I
would like to present what I think
5 matches
Mail list logo
