On 11 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
Daniel == Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel On 10 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
`scsh' ought to be taken over by someone who actually uses it. I've
not even looked at it in over a year.
Daniel If nobody objects
On 00-09-12 Daniel Kobras wrote:
On 11 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
Daniel == Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel On 10 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
`scsh' ought to be taken over by someone who actually uses it. I've
not even looked at it in over a
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
You don't need a package maintainer to adopt the package for getting a
new package uploaded. A sponsor for you and Martin would be enough to
upload the package to the archive.
Okay, sorry, wrong wording. That's what I had in mind. Someone to take
Daniel == Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel On 11 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
Daniel == Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel On 10 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
`scsh' ought to be taken over by someone who actually uses it. I've
Daniel == Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Daniel On 10 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
`scsh' ought to be taken over by someone who actually uses it. I've
not even looked at it in over a year.
Daniel If nobody objects I'd like to do this together with Martin
Hi!
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 01:42:14PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
Since you are teaming with Martin Gasbichler, and since Martin is a
co-author of Scsh, I'd say that puts you two in as most qualified to
handle the package. (Daniel? Please forward this mail to Martin.)
Yup, they are
6 matches
Mail list logo
