Re: Source field in binary Packages list

2008-08-31 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 07:13:50PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 03:21:36PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: Hello, I am working on a grouping feature for aptitude, to group

Re: Source field in binary Packages list

2008-08-31 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 02:20:27PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: Why do you need #497205? Is it too slow to just use SourcePkg() in the package records object? Daniel Sorry! I was lazy/stupid/whatever enough to not read more about apt and learn how to do it without adding a field to the

Source field in binary Packages list

2008-08-30 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Hello, I am working on a grouping feature for aptitude, to group binary packages by their source package. However, some packages in the Packages file do not have a Source field. My guess was to use the package name as the source package name. Is this right? Thanks, Thadeu Cascardo.

Re: Source field in binary Packages list

2008-08-30 Thread Raphael Geissert
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: Hello, I am working on a grouping feature for aptitude, to group binary packages by their source package. However, some packages in the Packages file do not have a Source field. My guess was to use the package name as the source package name. Is this

Re: Source field in binary Packages list

2008-08-30 Thread Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 03:21:36PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: Hello, I am working on a grouping feature for aptitude, to group binary packages by their source package. However, some packages in the Packages file do not have a Source field. My