On 04/01/2013 03:11 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
We had a move of not ubuntu-specific script from ubuntu-dev-tools 0.124
to devscripts 2.11.0 two years ago. These scripts were add-patch,
edit-patch, suspicious-source, what-patch, and wrap-and-sort. Maybe it's
time to do it again.
We have
Am Donnerstag, den 04.04.2013, 09:33 +0200 schrieb Thomas Bechtold:
On 04/01/2013 03:11 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
We had a move of not ubuntu-specific script from ubuntu-dev-tools 0.124
to devscripts 2.11.0 two years ago. These scripts were add-patch,
edit-patch, suspicious-source,
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
Apparently there are, but aside from that: should a 'bts' command on
$DERIVATIVE interact with the Debian bug-tracking system, or the
$DERIVATIVE bug-tracking system?
This can/should preferably be configurable,
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 05:18:53PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
This can/should preferably be configurable, defaulting to the Debian
BTS. Derivatives should be encouraged to override the defaults
accordingly.
In the case of our bts tool, I think it would be rather too much work
to
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
This can/should preferably be configurable, defaulting to the Debian
BTS. Derivatives should be encouraged to override the defaults
accordingly.
Only EmDebian is using debbugs and they use bugs.d.o. I didn't think
the bts command had
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 04:58:20PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 05:18:53PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
This can/should preferably be configurable, defaulting to the Debian
BTS. Derivatives should be encouraged to override the defaults
accordingly.
In the case
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 07:13:05PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
My point.
Sorry Ben!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130402204348.GC5048@debian
On 2 April 2013 16:18, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk wrote:
Apparently there are, but aside from that: should a 'bts' command on
$DERIVATIVE interact with the Debian bug-tracking system, or the
$DERIVATIVE
Am Sonntag, den 31.03.2013, 00:13 + schrieb Ben Hutchings:
On Sat, 2013-03-30 at 22:49 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Hi,
devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package
maintainer easier. Not every script in there is Debian packaging
specific. Some of them
Am Sonntag, den 31.03.2013, 09:24 +0100 schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:49:18PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
I like to keep only Debian packaging specific scripts in devscripts (see
the list below). Where should we put the non Debian packaging specific
scripts? Should we
Am Sonntag, den 31.03.2013, 12:12 -0400 schrieb Michael Gilbert:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Wookey wrote:
+++ Benjamin Drung [2013-03-30 22:49 +0100]:
Hi,
devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package
maintainer easier. Not every script in there is
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 31.03.2013, 00:13 + schrieb Ben Hutchings:
On Sat, 2013-03-30 at 22:49 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Hi,
devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package
maintainer easier.
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 14:41:53 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 31.03.2013, 00:13 + schrieb Ben Hutchings:
There is no reason why Debian couldn't continue to be upstream for
these, but hosting on freedesktop.org might make them more visible to
other distributions.
[...]
On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 14:41 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 31.03.2013, 00:13 + schrieb Ben Hutchings:
On Sat, 2013-03-30 at 22:49 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Hi,
devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package
maintainer easier. Not every
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:49:18PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package
maintainer easier. Not every script in there is Debian packaging
specific. Some of them are used on other non-Debian-based distributions.
I was contacted [1]
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:49:18PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
I like to keep only Debian packaging specific scripts in devscripts (see
the list below). Where should we put the non Debian packaging specific
scripts? Should we create a neutral project or are there other projects
in which these
+++ Benjamin Drung [2013-03-30 22:49 +0100]:
Hi,
devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package
maintainer easier. Not every script in there is Debian packaging
specific. Some of them are used on other non-Debian-based distributions.
Whilst considering what scripts
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Wookey wrote:
+++ Benjamin Drung [2013-03-30 22:49 +0100]:
Hi,
devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package
maintainer easier. Not every script in there is Debian packaging
specific. Some of them are used on other non-Debian-based
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Wookey woo...@wookware.org wrote:
+++ Benjamin Drung [2013-03-30 22:49 +0100]:
Hi,
devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package
maintainer easier. Not every script in there is Debian packaging
specific. Some of them are used
Hi,
devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package
maintainer easier. Not every script in there is Debian packaging
specific. Some of them are used on other non-Debian-based distributions.
I was contacted [1] and asked if we could split the Debian packaging
specific
On Sat, 2013-03-30 at 22:49 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Hi,
devscripts ships a bunch of scripts to make the life of a Debian Package
maintainer easier. Not every script in there is Debian packaging
specific. Some of them are used on other non-Debian-based distributions.
I was contacted [1]
21 matches
Mail list logo
