Re: Status of the src:lsb package

On Sep 23 2015, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2015-09-23 14:21, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >> Hi Nikolaus, >> >> Le jeudi, 17 septembre 2015, 09.27:56 Nikolaus Rath a écrit : >> > On Sep 17 2015, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >> > > Le jeudi, 17 septembre

Re: Status of the src:lsb package

Le jeudi, 17 septembre 2015, 23.00:51 Michael Biebl a écrit : > Am 17.09.2015 um 14:56 schrieb Didier 'OdyX' Raboud: > > After the discussion [0] about these changes back in July (on both > > debian-lsb@ and debian-devel@), I have uploaded src:lsb 9.20150826 > > to > > unstable, building no LSB

Re: Status of the src:lsb package

Hi Nikolaus, Le jeudi, 17 septembre 2015, 09.27:56 Nikolaus Rath a écrit : > On Sep 17 2015, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > Le jeudi, 17 septembre 2015, 08.46:24 Nikolaus Rath a écrit : > >> I don't know about formal LSB compatibility, but there are several > >> proprietary

Re: Status of the src:lsb package

On Sep 23 2015, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Hi Nikolaus, > > Le jeudi, 17 septembre 2015, 09.27:56 Nikolaus Rath a écrit : >> On Sep 17 2015, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: >> > Le jeudi, 17 septembre 2015, 08.46:24 Nikolaus Rath a écrit : >> >> I don't know

Re: Status of the src:lsb package

On 2015-09-23 14:21, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Hi Nikolaus, > > Le jeudi, 17 septembre 2015, 09.27:56 Nikolaus Rath a écrit : > > On Sep 17 2015, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > > Le jeudi, 17 septembre 2015, 08.46:24 Nikolaus Rath a écrit : > > >> I don't know about formal

Re: Status of the src:lsb package

Hi Didier, (Please honor the Mail-Followup-To or Mail-Copies-To header, thanks!) On Sep 17 2015, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le jeudi, 17 septembre 2015, 08.46:24 Nikolaus Rath a écrit : >> I don't know about formal LSB compatibility, but there are several >> proprietary

Re: Status of the src:lsb package

Le jeudi, 17 septembre 2015, 08.46:24 Nikolaus Rath a écrit : > I don't know about formal LSB compatibility, but there are several > proprietary applications that require nothing but the > /{lib,lib64}/ld-lsb.so* symlinks to work properly under Debian. So it > would be great if they could be

Re: Status of the src:lsb package

On Sep 17 2015, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote: > On Sep 17, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > >> This change landed in stretch on September 14. and is de facto the >> "outright giving up" of LSB support for Debian, from stretch onwards. As > > Is there any point in (formally?)

Status of the src:lsb package (was: Debian LSB compliance)

Hi all, It is time for an update about the lsb source package status, especially as a quite important change landed in testing. After the discussion [0] about these changes back in July (on both debian-lsb@ and debian-devel@), I have uploaded src:lsb 9.20150826 to unstable, building no LSB

Re: Status of the src:lsb package (was: Debian LSB compliance)

On Sep 17, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > This change landed in stretch on September 14. and is de facto the > "outright giving up" of LSB support for Debian, from stretch onwards. As Is there any point in (formally?) maintaining LSB compatibility? Is there any proprietary

Re: Status of the src:lsb package

m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) writes: > Is there any point in (formally?) maintaining LSB compatibility? Is > there any proprietary application that does actually benefit from it in > the real world? LSB seems pretty dead. I'm dubious there's much point in investing effort in this. -- Russ

Re: Status of the src:lsb package

Am 17.09.2015 um 14:56 schrieb Didier 'OdyX' Raboud: > After the discussion [0] about these changes back in July (on both > debian-lsb@ and debian-devel@), I have uploaded src:lsb 9.20150826 to > unstable, building no LSB compatibility packages anymore (besides lsb- > release and lsb-base). As