On 12.10.2014 23:41, Vincent Bernat wrote:
I thought that the pm-suspend part of acpid/acpi-support was disabled
when systemd is detected. See /usr/share/acpi-support/policy-funcs.
I forgot to mention that the experiment was on a sysvinit-core setup,
i.e. no pid 1 systemd. With systemd it works
Hi Martin,
thanks for your helpful insights.
see [3] –, neither is pm-suspend called by systemd's sleep.target.
Not by systemd as pid 1, but if you run with upstart or sysvinit,
systemd-shim will use pm-utils if it is installed, so that suspend
quirks still work.
My experiments showed that i
Hi Gregor,
That would make me sad, as I'm using both. Maybe this changes after I
switch to systemd but right now I need both.
Granted. I can't stand saddening my users.
After some more testing i found a way to fully support non-systemd
setups: TLP's pm-suspend hook is installed again.
Can you
Hi Vincent,
Isn't the pm-powersave stuff still working due to being invoked by acpid?
Thanks for your hint.
I experimented a bit and found that acpid + acpi-support call
pm-suspend. I found nothing that calls pm-powersave upon changing the
power source (ac - bat).
Regards, Thomas
--
Thomas
❦ 12 octobre 2014 20:54 +0200, Thomas Koch linrun...@gmx.net :
Isn't the pm-powersave stuff still working due to being invoked by acpid?
Thanks for your hint.
I experimented a bit and found that acpid + acpi-support call
pm-suspend. I found nothing that calls pm-powersave upon changing the
Hi,
see [3] –, neither is pm-suspend called by systemd's sleep.target.
Not by systemd as pid 1, but if you run with upstart or sysvinit,
systemd-shim will use pm-utils if it is installed, so that suspend
quirks still work.
IMHO it is a bit unfortunate that all the suspend quirks and
On Oct 09, Thomas Koch linrun...@gmx.net wrote:
Questions:
- Am i missing something here?
Last time I discussed this with the other systemd maintainers it
appeared that something (what?) still uses the pm-powersave
infrastructure, which does not have a systemd equivalent.
If this can be
Hi all,
i'm the author of the TLP power management tool [1].
With the help of my sponsor Andreas Tille i prepared a Debian package
[2] for TLP 0.6.
Older TLP packages – available via my PPA, not in Debian – depend on
pm-utils (pm-suspend) for being called upon suspend/resume events. The
On Thu, 09 Oct 2014 20:18:47 +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:
i'm the author of the TLP power management tool [1].
I'm a happy user of TLP - thanks for writing it.
Older TLP packages – available via my PPA, not in Debian – depend on
pm-utils (pm-suspend) for being called upon suspend/resume
❦ 9 octobre 2014 20:18 +0200, Thomas Koch linrun...@gmx.net :
Older TLP packages – available via my PPA, not in Debian – depend on
pm-utils (pm-suspend) for being called upon suspend/resume events. The
necessity to depend on (and coexist with) pm-utils is imho gone with
Debian's move to
Hello,
Thomas Koch [2014-10-09 20:18 +0200]:
Looking into the current pm-utils package in Debian testing i noticed
that it is kind of inert: nor is pm-powersave called by upowerd –
changed in upower 0.99.1-1
That is a good point. I didn't really notice yet as in Ubuntu we still
have the older
11 matches
Mail list logo
