also sprach Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.10.03.1016 +0200]:
I cannot disable IPsec at runtime as I cannot replace the IP stack
at runtime, and it modifies the IP stack. Moreover, you state the
The IPSEC stack does nothing unless you specify policies through
PFKEY or NETLINK. In
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [031006 21:57]:
The IPSEC stack does nothing unless you specify policies through
PFKEY or NETLINK. In other words, it is disabled by default.
From glancing over the patch, it *also* replaces parts of the non
IPsec i.e. standard IP stack. Maybe it
On Monday 06 October 2003 21:11, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
kernel developers dont use the debian source package as a base
for their work.
I have in the past for writing device drivers. Admittedly none are in the
mainstream kernel (afaik) but that is not the point.
Tom
--
^__^|
also sprach Andreas Schuldei [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.10.06.2211 +0200]:
From glancing over the patch, it *also* replaces parts of the
non IPsec i.e. standard IP stack. Maybe it provides the same
functionality to the end user. It does *not* provide the same
functionality to the developer.
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* If it's a feature, can it be disabled/enabled at runtime?
Sinec we're making generic kernels, this is a must. The presence
of the patch should not prevent me from doing something that I would
otherwise be able to do.
I cannot disable
also sprach Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003.10.03.0121 +0200]:
I have given you the reason for this many times already. Please
reread the thread on debian-devel carefully.
This one post did in fact slip my eyes. In it, you mention some
checks when it comes to patch inclusion.
I have a
6 matches
Mail list logo
