Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-07-30 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes: Le Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 05:10:57PM +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 23:58:29 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: Unfortunately, no binary package shows up on packages.debian.org. There must be something else broken in the

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-07-29 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 05:35:21PM +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : 20100723023339|process-upload|dak|Processing changes file|emboss_6.3.1-2_amd64.changes 20100723023358|process-upload|dak|installing changes|emboss_6.3.1-2_amd64.changes I assume the above is your upload.

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-07-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 23:58:29 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: Unfortunately, no binary package shows up on packages.debian.org. There must be something else broken in the changelog file I uploaded… packages.debian.org is not where packages show up. $ lftp -c 'open ftp.debian.org; cd

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-07-29 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 05:10:57PM +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 23:58:29 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: Unfortunately, no binary package shows up on packages.debian.org. There must be something else broken in the changelog file I uploaded… packages.debian.org

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-07-28 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes: On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:54:08 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: while I managed to trigger autobuilding on all architectures for one package (velvet) in February, the same approach applied to another another one (emboss) gives problems: the

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-07-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:54:08 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: while I managed to trigger autobuilding on all architectures for one package (velvet) in February, the same approach applied to another another one (emboss) gives problems: the architecture-dependant packages are built, but they

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-07-26 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:59:45AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : Le Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 01:22:38AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : I found it interesting that a package like git-core is autobuilt on all ports since at upload time it only contains the source and

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-01-26 Thread James Vega
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 08:14:14AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org writes: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:24:49PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: That has always been a feature but recently the DAK has changed to throw away the maintainer build debs (while

Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-01-25 Thread Charles Plessy
Hi all, I found it interesting that a package like git-core is autobuilt on all ports since at upload time it only contains the source and architecture-independant binary packages. I like it. I always feel sorry that no build logs are available for the architecture I use for upload. Before I

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-01-25 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes: Hi all, I found it interesting that a package like git-core is autobuilt on all ports since at upload time it only contains the source and architecture-independant binary packages. I like it. I always feel sorry that no build logs are available for

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-01-25 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:24:49PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes: Hi all, I found it interesting that a package like git-core is autobuilt on all ports since at upload time it only contains the source and architecture-independant

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-01-25 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Before I start to do the same when possible, is it a bug or a feature ? Both. That has always been a feature but recently the DAK has changed to throw away the maintainer build debs (while still requireing them to be uploaded) and running an autobuild on all archs. Oh, when did that

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-01-25 Thread Joerg Jaspert
I found it interesting that a package like git-core is autobuilt on all ports since at upload time it only contains the source and architecture-independant binary packages. I like it. I always feel sorry that no build logs are available for the architecture I use for upload. Before I start

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-01-25 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 01:22:38AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : I found it interesting that a package like git-core is autobuilt on all ports since at upload time it only contains the source and architecture-independant binary packages. I like it. I always feel sorry that no build

Re: Uploads without the architecture-dependant binary packages.

2010-01-25 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org writes: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 06:24:49PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes: Hi all, I found it interesting that a package like git-core is autobuilt on all ports since at upload time it only contains the