On 06-Aug-05, 17:42 (CDT), Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That said, what exactly is the problem kernel-image-x.y.z providing a
kernel image for *bsd or hurd or whatever on the matching platform?
Bug reports.
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that Bill Gates claims
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 10:59:51AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 06-Aug-05, 17:42 (CDT), Marcelo E. Magallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That said, what exactly is the problem kernel-image-x.y.z
providing a kernel image for *bsd or hurd or whatever on the
matching platform?
Bug
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 06:48:49PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 18:15, Steve Greenland wrote:
Thanks for the pointer, Adam, and a giant Feh! to the genius who came
up with that idea.
Did you even think of asking for the rationale behind the name change?
No
On Aug 04, Paul Brossier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would also like to understand. 2.6.12 being available doesn't help.
The package remains un-upgradable from sarge or etch.
Sarge or etch do not have newer versions of udev to upgrade to.
As Manoj and Blars said, solutions would be to have
Steve Greenland wrote:
I know what the rationale is: to avoid offending the *BSD and Hurd
users, because, ya know, they have kernels too. And if we were starting
from scratch, I'd be all for it. But at this point, it's just a stupid
annoying change that makes it hard for people to find
On 04-Aug-05, 05:09 (CDT), Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Greenland wrote:
I know what the rationale is: to avoid offending the *BSD and Hurd
users, because, ya know, they have kernels too. And if we were starting
from scratch, I'd be all for it. But at this point, it's just a
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 11:34:16AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Aug 04, Paul Brossier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would also like to understand. 2.6.12 being available doesn't help.
The package remains un-upgradable from sarge or etch.
Sarge or etch do not have newer versions of udev to
Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 04-Aug-05, 05:09 (CDT), Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Greenland wrote:
I know what the rationale is: to avoid offending the *BSD and Hurd
users, because, ya know, they have kernels too. And if we were starting
from scratch, I'd be
I demand that Goswin von Brederlow may or may not have written...
[snip]
I would have suggested using
kernel-hurt-image
^
Ouch.
;-)
--
| Darren Salt | linux (or ds) at | nr. Ashington,
| sarge,| youmustbejoking | Northumberland
| RISC OS | demon co uk |
Darren Salt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I demand that Goswin von Brederlow may or may not have written...
[snip]
I would have suggested using
kernel-hurt-image
^
Ouch.
;-)
Pun intended.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Goswin == Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One can't even claim that using 'kernel-image*' will confuse
the users of the *BSD or Hurd ports, because those packages
simply won't be in their Package files, will they?
There may be good reasons to install Linux even if
Brian May [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Goswin == Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One can't even claim that using 'kernel-image*' will confuse
the users of the *BSD or Hurd ports, because those packages
simply won't be in their Package files, will they?
There may
In short:
The udev from sid breaks ugrade process because it doesn't support kernels
2.6.12. There is no kernel 2.6.12 packages in the distro, yet. As far as the
more packages depends on newer udev (i.e. alsa-base, usbmount) I have to hold
on more and more packages.
See Bug#317332. It seems
On 03/08/05, Piotr Roszatycki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In short:
The udev from sid breaks ugrade process because it doesn't support kernels
2.6.12. There is no kernel 2.6.12 packages in the distro, yet. As far as the
more packages depends on newer udev (i.e. alsa-base, usbmount) I have to
On 03-Aug-05, 04:11 (CDT), Adam Mercer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it has been renamed from kernel-image to linux-image
Oh, sweet Jesus.
Thanks for the pointer, Adam, and a giant Feh! to the genius who came
up with that idea.
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 18:15, Steve Greenland wrote:
Thanks for the pointer, Adam, and a giant Feh! to the genius who came
up with that idea.
Did you even think of asking for the rationale behind the name change?
Hint: check the archives of the kernel mailing list.
Cheers,
FJP
On 8/3/05, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 18:15, Steve Greenland wrote:
Thanks for the pointer, Adam, and a giant Feh! to the genius who came
up with that idea.
Did you even think of asking for the rationale behind the name change?
Hint: check the
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 18:48 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 18:15, Steve Greenland wrote:
Thanks for the pointer, Adam, and a giant Feh! to the genius who came
up with that idea.
Did you even think of asking for the rationale behind the name change?
Hint: check the
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 19:04, Ben Armstrong wrote:
... which, for the lazy and/or impatient starts here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/07/msg00192.html
To be honest, I was thinking more of:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/05/msg00403.html
pgpwqNMtXaRDY.pgp
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 14:02 -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Closing, it isn't a bash against the kernel team. It isn't my point,
my problem is with this didn't you know, read X stupid! approach.
I don't think pointing at the mailing list was an unreasonable reaction
to the genius comment, which
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 19:16 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 19:04, Ben Armstrong wrote:
... which, for the lazy and/or impatient starts here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/07/msg00192.html
To be honest, I was thinking more of:
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 19:02, Gustavo Franco wrote:
On 8/3/05, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 18:15, Steve Greenland wrote:
Thanks for the pointer, Adam, and a giant Feh! to the genius who
came up with that idea.
Did you even think of asking for
On 8/3/05, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Closing, it isn't a bash against the kernel team. It isn't my point,
my problem is with this didn't you know, read X stupid! approach.
Just reply or let anyone else help the developer or user asking us.
Didn't he asked the rationale
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 14:18:01 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 14:02 -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Closing, it isn't a bash against the kernel team. It isn't my point,
my problem is with this didn't you know, read X stupid! approach.
I don't think pointing at the mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 18:15, Steve Greenland wrote:
Thanks for the pointer, Adam, and a giant Feh! to the genius who came
up with that idea.
Did you even think of asking for the rationale behind the name change?
Hint:
On 03-Aug-05, 11:48 (CDT), Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 18:15, Steve Greenland wrote:
Thanks for the pointer, Adam, and a giant Feh! to the genius who came
up with that idea.
Did you even think of asking for the rationale behind the name change?
I know
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 10:51:19AM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
In short:
The udev from sid breaks ugrade process because it doesn't support kernels
2.6.12. There is no kernel 2.6.12 packages in the distro, yet. As far as the
more packages depends on newer udev (i.e. alsa-base,
27 matches
Mail list logo
