Hi,
Now that squeeze is released, it's time to start pushing new things to
unstable. I've been asked several times already how things would be
evolving in the near future, to which I answered it would quite stay the
way it is now until upstream releases 4.0, at which point I'd upload 4.0
to
Am Freitag, den 18.02.2011, 10:12 +0100 schrieb Mike Hommey:
Hi,
Now that squeeze is released, it's time to start pushing new things to
unstable. I've been asked several times already how things would be
evolving in the near future, to which I answered it would quite stay the
way it is now
On Feb 18, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
- Suggest your own if you have better ideas (really, I mean it).
I support option #2: I have been using it since you started packaging it
and it works great: better than 3.6 and hugely better than 3.5.
s390, sparc and ia64 are not exactly popular
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:12:42AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
snip
As I mentioned above, my initial idea was to go with the second option,
breaking most rdeps in the process, but then I remembered that 4.0
doesn't work on all our architectures, and I'm hesitating, now.
So, fellow developers,
Hi,
Mike Hommey wrote:
- Push 3.6 to unstable and the last 4.0 betas/rc to experimental. Push
4.0 to unstable when it's out.
That would be my favourite.
I use Conkeror (which is a XULRunner application and hence depends on
xulrunner) with 3.6 since it is in experimental and it works without
Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 10:29 +0100, Benjamin Drung a écrit :
I favor a combination of idea one and two, which is: Keep 3.5 in
unstable and push the last 4.0 betas/rc to experimental. Push 4.0 to
unstable when it's out.
Then we have one big break and a tested 4.0 in unstable.
I’d
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:12:42AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
[iceweasel]
- Push 3.6 to unstable and the last 4.0 betas/rc to experimental. Push
4.0 to unstable when it's out.
Extra effort for you.
- Keep 3.5 in unstable, 3.6 in experimental, and push 4.0 to experimental
when it's
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:59:46PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 10:29 +0100, Benjamin Drung a écrit :
I favor a combination of idea one and two, which is: Keep 3.5 in
unstable and push the last 4.0 betas/rc to experimental. Push 4.0 to
unstable when it's
Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 13:34 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:59:46PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
I’d favor that one too. The sooner we can adapt reverse dependencies to
4.0 in experimental, the better. And no need to do the work twice.
There have been
On 02/18/2011 05:42 AM, Axel Beckert wrote:
Hi,
Mike Hommey wrote:
- Push 3.6 to unstable and the last 4.0 betas/rc to experimental. Push
4.0 to unstable when it's out.
That would be my favourite.
I use Conkeror (which is a XULRunner application and hence depends on
xulrunner) with 3.6
10 matches
Mail list logo
