Re: Work-needing packages report for May 4, 2001

2001-05-05 Thread Arthur Korn
Carlos Laviola schrieb: I hope that's a joke, because, based _solely_ on that comparison table, the reason one should use snarf over wget is because it has a cool progressbar. snarf is also a lot smaller than wget. (According to the chart) ciao, 2ri -- They are really completely different

Work-needing packages report for May 4, 2001

2001-05-04 Thread wnpp
Report about packages that need work for May 4, 2001 Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 33 Number of packages offered up for adoption this week: 1 Total number of orphaned packages: 57 Number of packages orphaned this week: 1 The number in parenthesis after each package name is

Re: Work-needing packages report for May 4, 2001

2001-05-04 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
retitle 86871 ITA: snarf -- command line URL grabber snarf (#86871), orphaned 71 days ago Description: A command-line URL grabber I'll take this. It's one of the first packages I install on a new system, and I use it all the time. Plus I know the guy who wrote it. And anybody who

Re: Work-needing packages report for May 4, 2001

2001-05-04 Thread Carlos Laviola
On 04-May-2001 Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: retitle 86871 ITA: snarf -- command line URL grabber snarf (#86871), orphaned 71 days ago Description: A command-line URL grabber I'll take this. It's one of the first packages I install on a new system, and I use it all the time. Plus I