I'm not arguing the rest of your points, but I'm curious about
this one. IIRC, the last thing a full bootstrap of GCC does,
after building stage one binaries with the native compiler,
Hum, It *used* to do this, can't seem to get it to do it today though
oh well
IIRC it only
you're quite right. why are we using rsync anyway? in it's current state
it's a waste of resources except for block-oriented files like cdimages.
wouldn't it make more sense to use something like mirror or wget untill
debdiff matures? are mirror admins required to use rsync?
another tought: would
On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
wouldn't it make more sense to use something like mirror or wget untill
debdiff matures? are mirror admins required to use rsync?
Sadly rsync is far, far better that mirror or wget, both of which are
verging on useless for an archive of our size.
We
hi everybody
I have implemented
a good idea for reducing download stress for everybody who is
mirroring a lot of data using rsync,
like, the people who are mirroring Debian GNU/Linux:
currently, many Debian leaf mirrors are using rsync
for mirroring from the main .debian.org hosts.
rsync
tom rothamel is working on a project called debdiff that works towards the
same goal. please read his announcment thread, which is archived at
http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-devel-0002/msg00391.htm.
i like the idea of rsync modules, but the concept you project misses is that
even a
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Andrea Mennucc1 wrote:
rsync contains a wonderful algorithm to speedup downloads when mirroring
files which have only minor differences;
only problem is, this algorithm is ALMOST NEVER used
when mirroring a debian repository
Small detail here, .debs, like .gz files are
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 12:26:30PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
differences very, very small. This is particularly true for .debs when you
add in the fact that gcc never produces binary identical output on
consecutive runs.
I'm not arguing the rest of your points, but I'm curious about
this
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, David Starner wrote:
I'm not arguing the rest of your points, but I'm curious about
this one. IIRC, the last thing a full bootstrap of GCC does,
after building stage one binaries with the native compiler,
Hum, It *used* to do this, can't seem to get it to do it today
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 12:46:05PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, David Starner wrote:
I'm not arguing the rest of your points, but I'm curious about
this one. IIRC, the last thing a full bootstrap of GCC does,
after building stage one binaries with the native
On 9 Mar 2000 12:56:29 -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
tom rothamel is working on a project called debdiff that works towards the
same goal. please read his announcment thread, which is archived at
http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-devel-0002/msg00391.htm.
The code associated with this is
10 matches
Mail list logo
