Le jeudi 08 décembre 2005 à 02:03 -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit :
Which translates here to:
1) Buildd admin should be people interested in supporting the port.
2) People that are going to support the port must get the responsibility.
Which is great as a statement of principle, but it
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:40:17AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
As a result, no one can help with buildd maintenance as the current
buildd admins won't let anyone help them, however overloaded they can
be. They refuse to delegate any part of their powers because people
aren't skilled enough,
I don't know what's wrong but I think there is on principle, which
shouldn't be forgotten. Try to understand first and then to be
understood. I'd like to help, but may be I can't. Read Stephen Covey
books.
2005/12/8, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:40:17AM +0100,
Steve Langasek wrote:
Er, did you even *read* this thread? We got on the topic of buildds because
*someone refused to help diagnose build failures because they consider it the
buildd admin's job*.
Maybe it's not entirely impossible that the other subthread starting at
| Wonderful. Nice to
4 matches
Mail list logo
